* Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com [Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:32:51 +0100]:
Converted all of for..in into $.each(). The most funny thing is that
$.each() did not work correctly with sparse arrays [], walking with
undefs between real elements. While for..in used to work fine
(FF,Chrome,IE8,IE9). So I
Hi!
I've tweaked my code few times, trying to make it simpler: got rid of
some closure calls and left only one dynamic module load at client-side.
http://pastebin.com/UxyifLmx
http://pastebin.com/q3Tm6Ajd
http://pastebin.com/4emMDBS6
Still, it gives me headaches, because mw.loader.using(
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:40:54 -0700, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
Hi!
I've tweaked my code few times, trying to make it simpler: got rid of
some closure calls and left only one dynamic module load at client-side.
http://pastebin.com/UxyifLmx
http://pastebin.com/q3Tm6Ajd
* Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com [Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:35:21
-0700]:
Autoloading classes is not possible. Even if every browser supported
getters and we could use them to dynamically load classes, this would
require synchronous http calls. Which are absolutely HORRIBLE because
they
* Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com [Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:35:21
-0700]:
( function( $, mw ) {
} )( jQuery, mediaWiki );
I modified all of three modules: main, view and edit module to the
recommended pattern.
http://pastebin.com/1kS6EyUu
http://pastebin.com/WQzBTw6W
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:07:54 -0700, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
* Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com [Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:35:21
-0700]:
Autoloading classes is not possible. Even if every browser supported
getters and we could use them to dynamically load classes, this
offtopic
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.comwrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:40:54 -0700, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
var jqgmap = [];
for ( var mapIndex in jqgmap ) {
This is VERY bad JavaScript coding practice. Please use $.each().
offtopic
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:40:54 -0700, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
var jqgmap = [];
for ( var mapIndex in jqgmap ) {
On 19.03.2012 17:23, Krinkle wrote:
offtopic
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.comwrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:40:54 -0700, Dmitriy Sintsovques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
var jqgmap = [];
for ( var mapIndex in jqgmap ) {
This is VERY bad JavaScript coding
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:23:13 -0700, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
offtopic
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.comwrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:40:54 -0700, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
var jqgmap = [];
for ( var mapIndex in jqgmap ) {
On 18.03.2012 18:26, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
replaced 'new MarkerController(...)' calls to 'new
mw.jqgmap.MarkerController(...)' calls left from incomplete refactoring
of early working (non-broken) revision, however refactored separate view
/ edit modules code still does not work, with the
11 matches
Mail list logo
