Hi Daniel,
thanks for this e-mail. Maybe I'm the only one, but the e-mail title is, in my
opinion, a bit misleading :P As I read the title first, I thought, that the
mediawiki/core maintenance scripts (which are in the maintenance/ directory in
MediaWiki) itself were moved, but after reading
Mediawiki maintenance scripts have moved. The old "misc/maintenance.pp"
that had all cronjobs and scripts in one huge file is gone.
Now you find all the maintenance scripts in separate files, one per job,
and inside the mediawiki module.
So if you look for anything please see
Have been struggling with this issue for a good few days.
I am currently trying to get oauth to work from node using
passport-mediawiki.
I get as far as getting asked to authorise the oauth application for the
user on a screen that reads:
Hi user1,
ResourceEdge Dev 5 would like to have basic
Hi folks,
Executive summary:
T108255 is the default option for our Wednesday RfC review (E66)[0].
As part of improving our database use, we need to start gating our
code review on better shared norms of SQL correctness. We need to
enable strict mode, cleanup/enforce primary keys (T17441), and
Have been struggling with this issue for a good few days.
I am currently trying to get oauth to work from node using
passport-mediawiki.
I get as far as getting asked to authorise the oauth application for the
user on a screen that reads:
> Hi user1,
>
> ResourceEdge Dev 5 would like to have
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Dan Garry wrote:
> I think what should be done here is to define exactly what it is we're
> hoping to get from the participation of template creators, and what we hope
> they get from attending the summit. Perhaps several sessions around
>
Have been struggling with this issue for a good few days.
I am currently trying to get oauth to work from node using
passport-mediawiki.
I get as far as getting asked to authorise the oauth application for the
user on a screen that reads:
Hi user1,
ResourceEdge Dev 5 would like to have basic
Thank you very much, thought I was just missing something obvious
Added it as https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112635
/Ben
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Gergo Tisza wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Bengt Bjorkberg
> wrote:
>
> >
Rob,
Please use https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112637 as the RFC and lets
revert the ticket to the original scope.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Executive summary:
> T108255 is the default option for our Wednesday RfC review
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112608
Il 15/09/2015 11:43, Strainu ha scritto:
Hi guys,
The tools.wmflabs.org certificate has expired this morning. This
directly impatcs wikis using services, such as maps, in the pages.
Thanks,
Strainu
___
Not to mention images, dynamic parser extensions that do not
functionally depend on their input, changes to site javascript, etc.
On 9/14/15, John Erling Blad wrote:
> You will run into problems with transclusions
> http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/xmlsig#w3c_all
>
> On Tue,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Bengt Bjorkberg wrote:
> "There are problems with some of your input."
>
At a glance that's a generic text used when a form has validation errors
but the validator did not supply an error message.
> But no info as to what the issue is. Not
Hi Daniel, thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikimedia.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Moisset
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm one of the developers of thewalnut.io, a platform for authoring
> and
> sharing algorithm visualizations. While working on a
Hi guys,
The tools.wmflabs.org certificate has expired this morning. This
directly impatcs wikis using services, such as maps, in the pages.
Thanks,
Strainu
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:10 -0500, Mark Holmquist wrote:
> Are these questions listed on some UploadWizard wikipage/section?
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback says
> "To resolve issues, it helps us
On 15 September 2015 at 08:26, James Forrester
wrote:
> On 15 September 2015 at 08:10, Mark Holmquist
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:10 -0500, Mark Holmquist wrote:
>>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Just to make clear what my problem is, here is example. There is a
> user 75.69.113.86 who made 3 consecutive edits to page "Battle
> Tendency". These edits can be displayed using these 3 API's:
>
> *
>
On 15 September 2015 at 06:19, Brian Wolff wrote:
>
> I suppose I'm kind of confused by the scope. We want template creators
> to propose RFCs for architecture changes in MediaWiki?
>
In some senses, template creators are developers just like the rest of us.
They're writing
You would need to use the rev_id of the page prior to the IP editing to get
all changes that they made. Otherwise your not comparing to the page text
prior to their first edit
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Just to make clear what my problem is, here is
That "compare" feature look promising. Thanks
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
>
>> I suppose in that case I would set RevID to 520 and DiffTo to 20. That
>> however
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> I suppose in that case I would set RevID to 520 and DiffTo to 20. That
> however doesn't seem to work. It shows the diff, but other way, it
> shows diff from 520 to 20 (and I think it even excludes that revision)
> not from
Just to make clear what my problem is, here is example. There is a
user 75.69.113.86 who made 3 consecutive edits to page "Battle
Tendency". These edits can be displayed using these 3 API's:
*
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dan Garry wrote:
> However, you're right that one would not expect such people to propose
> architecture changes in MediaWiki; that's not really their domain. However,
> to me that does not seem necessary in order to attend the developer
On 2015-09-14 13:44, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote:
Hi,
UploadWizard has a lot of bugs and is sometimes defacto unusable.
Hi. UploadWizard is maintained by a three-person team, and it's only one
of many responsibilities every of us has. Personally I find it perfectly
usable.
> See also
You have probably read the announcement of the Wikimedia Developer Summit
2016 registration and call for participation.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit_2016
I just want to stress that this year we are putting a special emphasis on
inviting not only the developers of
Le 14/09/2015 23:00, Antoine Musso a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> The next continuous integration checkin is tomorrow Tuesday 15th at
> 14:00 UTC (16:00 CEST) in #wikimedia-office *and Google hangouts*:
>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/wikimedia.org/ci-weekly
>
> You would need a Google account
On 15 September 2015 at 08:10, Mark Holmquist
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:10 -0500, Mark Holmquist wrote:
> > Are these questions listed on some UploadWizard wikipage/section?
> >
>
> I think this is the key point. Remember that this is the "developer summit"
> and
> not an "architecture summit", and as such anything MediaWiki-related is up
> for
> grabs. And if the topic of templates comes up, specifically what we need to
> fix
> in templates or what new features we should
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Is there going to be a hangout stream for the presentations so that
> people who can't attend (trip is just too expensive) can see or
> participate at them?
>
We are discussing video in the Summit at
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:40:17PM +0200, Purodha Blissenbach wrote:
> jst a few minues ago, I tried to use the upload wizard of commons.
> It stalled in the midst of everything and it did not upload anything.
Purodha,
This is the sort of bug report that we, as people who try to maintain Upload
>
> We want to increase their participation bringing their own proposals and
> joining others' as stakeholders,
I suppose I'm kind of confused by the scope. We want template creators
to propose RFCs for architecture changes in MediaWiki?
--
-bawolff
Hi,
jst a few minues ago, I tried to use the upload wizard of commons.
It stalled in the midst of everything and it did not upload anything.
Purodha
On 15.09.2015 14:18, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
On 2015-09-14 13:44, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote:
Hi,
UploadWizard has a lot of bugs and is
Is there going to be a hangout stream for the presentations so that
people who can't attend (trip is just too expensive) can see or
participate at them?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> You have probably read the announcement of the Wikimedia Developer
I am trying to understand how this works:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Revisions
There is a parameter DiffTo which says: Revision ID to diff each
revision to. Use "prev", "next" and "cur" for the previous, next and
current revision respectively.
I suppose that I can give it revision ID
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:10 -0500, Mark Holmquist wrote:
> What file(s) were you using? How long did you wait between opening the page
> and uploading the file(s)? What license(s) are you uploading them under?
> What file format are they? What browser were you using? What OS? Do you get
> any
35 matches
Mail list logo