Re: [Wikitech-l] Inhibitors for Mobile Content Service to use Parsoid output

2015-10-19 Thread Brian Gerstle
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Gabriel Wicke wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Brian Gerstle > wrote: > > > I've mentioned this idea before, but having a service which allowed you > to > > reliably get image thumbs for a given file at a

Re: [Wikitech-l] Inhibitors for Mobile Content Service to use Parsoid output

2015-10-19 Thread Brian Gerstle
Right, but the point is to avoid an extra round trip just to get a URL. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote: > On 2015-10-19 17:28, Brian Gerstle wrote: > >> It's been mentioned elsewhere (I believe by Gergo) that these URLs aren't >> stable, and can't

[Wikitech-l] JetBrains IDE licenses for MW developers - php, js/node, python, C/C++, puppet, ruby, ...

2015-10-19 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
Developers, we now have licenses for JetBrains' IDEA Ultimate (JavaScript, PHP, Python, ...) and CLion (C/C++). The IDE supports debugging in Vagrant and on-the-fly static code analysis. If you are a volunteer developer, and

Re: [Wikitech-l] Inhibitors for Mobile Content Service to use Parsoid output

2015-10-19 Thread Bartosz Dziewoński
On 2015-10-19 17:28, Brian Gerstle wrote: It's been mentioned elsewhere (I believe by Gergo) that these URLs aren't stable, and can't be reliably constructed by clients. Is that still the case? The URL looks different for very long file names and for different file types. There is an API

[Wikitech-l] TimedMediaHandler changing interactions with ResourceLoader

2015-10-19 Thread Brion Vibber
I've gone ahead and merged these two changes by TheDJ to MwEmbedSupport and TimedMediaHandler extensions (they are interdependent): * https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/172556/ * https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/172421/ These clean up how TMH's JavaScript modules get integrated into

Re: [Wikitech-l] Inhibitors for Mobile Content Service to use Parsoid output

2015-10-19 Thread Subramanya Sastry
On 10/16/2015 01:14 PM, Bernd Sitzmann wrote: In any case, given that Parsoid's HTML clients usually talk through RESTBase rather than with Parsoid directly, this optional API flag would also have to be supported in RESTBase, and could potentially follow the redirects on behalf of the clients.