Re: [Wikitech-l] What ways are there to include user-edited JavaScript in a wiki page? (threat model: crypto miners)

2018-03-19 Thread David Gerard
This is particularly important for non-Wikimedia instances of MediaWiki, by the way. (e.g. on RationalWiki there's a cultural thing of "everyone is a sysop!" but the interface/JS editing rights are restricted to a much smaller "tech" group who are trusted not to be silly) - d. On 19 March

Re: [Wikitech-l] changes coming to large dumps

2018-03-19 Thread Ariel Glenn WMF
A reprieve! Code's not ready and I need to do some timing tests, so the March 20th run will do the standard recombining. For updates, don't forget to check the Phab ticket! https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T179059 On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Ariel Glenn WMF wrote: >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Incoming and outgoing links enquiry

2018-03-19 Thread Erik Bernhardson
This information is available mostly pre-calculated in the CirrusSearch dumps at http://dumps.wikimedia.your.org/other/cirrussearch/current/ Each article is represented by a line of json in those dumps. There is a field called 'incoming_links' which is the number of unique articles with links

Re: [Wikitech-l] Refactoring MonoBook

2018-03-19 Thread Isarra Yos
On 18/03/18 03:09, K. Peachey wrote: Just make it MonoBookV5? *runs*, or more realistically V2 then progressively get rid of the orginal MonoBook? The problem with splitting things up like that is then you need to deal with transitions from a v1 to a v2, which make everyone's lives more

Re: [Wikitech-l] What ways are there to include user-edited JavaScript in a wiki page? (threat model: crypto miners)

2018-03-19 Thread Derk-Jan Hartman
On a side note. Have we looked recently at decoupling the site wide JS/CSS rights from the edit interface right ? It has always seemed a bit weird to me that we had both these things in MediaWiki namespace, but the more we are closing down raw HTML in MediaWiki namespace, the weirder it becomes.