What about this idea: We could introduce a new CSS class called
'nomobile' that functioned similarly to 'noprint' — any element set to
this class would be hidden completely on mobile devices. If someone
noticed a problem with a specific template on mobile devices, they could
either fix the
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/images/specificitywars-05v2.jpg
I think theres a limitation to that, .nomobile .darthvader
.darthvader will not work as expected (I think)
On 11 May 2012 10:24, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
What about this idea: We could introduce a
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:52:17 -0700, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Jon Robson wrote:
Sorry for the lack of continued discussion on this thread. I've been
thinking lots and lots about this over the last weeks and would like
to suggest a course of action.
I think we are agreed that the
On 11.05.2012, 12:24 Ryan wrote:
What about this idea: We could introduce a new CSS class called
'nomobile' that functioned similarly to 'noprint' — any element set to
this class would be hidden completely on mobile devices. If someone
noticed a problem with a specific template on mobile
It would be good if possible to get a more accurate feel for what
percentage of articles use inline styles.
e.g. articles that contain style= vs articles that don't
This would help us get a better idea of what we are dealing with.
The example given of highlighting - I understand the need for
Stephen Smoogen has opened a bug about the license in CSS Janus. This
needs wider discussion, though, so I'm copying it here.
From https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36747:
I am the maintainer of the mediawiki package for Fedora EPEL
project. While putting together the package for 1.19 it
Ladsgroup posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10152.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10152#c32797
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10152:
Adding categories sort for Persian Wikipedia
Ladsgroup's comment:
1-No. We tried so many locale system. you can see it in my talk
Ladsgroup posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10152.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10152#c32798
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10152:
Adding categories sort for Persian Wikipedia
Ladsgroup's comment:
1-No. We tried so many locale system. you can see it in my talk
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I am the maintainer of the mediawiki package for Fedora EPEL
project. While putting together the package for 1.19 it was found
that the license to maintenance/cssjanus is ASL 2.0 and the license
for
Am 11.05.2012 10:24, schrieb Ryan Kaldari:
What about this idea: We could introduce a new CSS class called
'nomobile' that functioned similarly to 'noprint' —
as we are talking about this - yes, I know [1]) -
in a previous posting on #mediawiki_
I already asked to introduce a new class
_
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r115180 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/115180
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r115180:
Template moved from xx to qot.
Per
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
2) we need to look at mediawiki being used as GPL 3.0 even though it
is not explicitely licensed that way.
I'm not 100% sure what's being asked here? Is this a request to relicense
MediaWiki under GPLv3 instead
I think this is a solvable problem without changing our current
licensing. Let's not have a big legal discussion on-list about this
(or if we must hash this out publicly, let's do it on a list that
deals with legal issues rather than tech issues).
I've assigned the bug to myself, and I'll be
Hey Lars,
You might be interested in the WMF Analytics mailing list at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics. There we discuss all
our overall analytics projects, usually a little bit less focused on Mediawiki
issues, but definitely focused on WMF data.
Hope to see you there!
On 11 May 2012 16:41, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what's being asked here? Is this a request to relicense
MediaWiki under GPLv3 instead of v2? Or is this a question of it being
mis-licensed under v3 when we actually specify v2? Clarification is
needed :)
If it's
On 05/11/2012 05:02 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
It would be good if possible to get a more accurate feel for what
percentage of articles use inline styles.
e.g. articles that contain style= vs articles that don't
This would help us get a better idea of what we are dealing with.
I just grepped an
On 11 May 2012 09:03, Mark A. Hershberger m...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Stephen Smoogen has opened a bug about the license in CSS Janus. This
needs wider discussion, though, so I'm copying it here.
From https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36747:
I am the maintainer of the mediawiki package for
Daniel Friesen wrote:
Saying that inline styles are present on over 99% pages on en.wp is a
logical fallacy.
99% of articles may have inline styles in their output but the only pages
that are an actual issue are ones where the inline styles are in the
content themselves not in embedded
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Maybe we're not talking about the same thing, then? I see plenty of inline
styling throughout the page source of this page. E.g., table class=infobox
vcard style=width: 25em; font-size: 88%; line-height: 1.5em
I believe you
19 matches
Mail list logo
