If I recall correctly, it used to be the default, but it was removed after
some Bugzilla vandalism in 2011.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Legoktm
wrote:
> On 5/29/14, 11:57 AM, Mark Holmquist wrote:
>
> Solution: We've made every editbugs user able to add editbugs to an
>> account. I've do
On 5/29/14, 11:57 AM, Mark Holmquist wrote:
Solution: We've made every editbugs user able to add editbugs to an account.
I've documented the process here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bugzilla#Why_can.27t_I_claim_a_bug_or_mark_it_resolved.3F
Does this only apply to every user who has editb
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:34 PM, ENWP Pine wrote:
> Hi, I'm getting some 404 errors consistently when trying to load some
> English Wikipedia articles. Other pages load ok. Did something break?
>
TL;DR: A package update went badly.
Nitty-gritty postmortem:
At 20:25 (all times UTC), change Ie5a
On Thursday, May 29, 2014, Mark Holmquist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the nth time, in #mediawiki, I've had someone ask how to be able to
> mark a bug as resolved, or claim it, or mark it as a duplicate of another
> bug. I conceptually know that this means "getting editbugs permissions" but
> it happens
I should have also noted -- there is something strange going on with the
frontend to Special:Collection. You have to manually refresh to see status
updates...
~Matt Walker
Wikimedia Foundation
Fundraising Technology Team
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Walker
wrote:
> I'm happy to rep
I'm happy to report that after a LONG time fighting with deployment the
test instance is available in beta labs (en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org and
all others) via the WMF PDF option in Special:Collection and on the side
panel.
It is very rough still in terms of reliable rendering (it doesn't like
Oh yay finally.
Ive been wishing we did that for literally years.
Thanks for making this happen.
--bawolff
On May 29, 2014 2:57 PM, "Mark Holmquist" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For the nth time, in #mediawiki, I've had someone ask how to be able to
mark a bug as resolved, or claim it, or mark it as a du
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Niklas Laxström
wrote:
> 2014-05-29 20:27 GMT+03:00 Bryan Davis :
>> What use cases did I miss? What other concerns do we have for this process?
>
> The email subject does not cover third party users, so apologies if
> this is not the correct place for this.
We ne
Hello everyone,
I would like to announce the release of MediaWiki 1.19.16, 1.21.10 and 1.22.7.
This is a regular security and maintenance release. Download links are given at
the end of this email.
== Security ==
* (bug 65501) SECURITY: Don't parse usernames as wikitext on
Special:PasswordRe
Thanks Dan and Erik.
Pine
> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 13:36:12 -0700
> From: Dan Garry
> To: Wikimedia developers
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] 404 errors
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I'm getting these errors too.
>
> Judging by the chatter in #wikimedia-op
2014-05-29 20:27 GMT+03:00 Bryan Davis :
> What use cases did I miss? What other concerns do we have for this process?
The email subject does not cover third party users, so apologies if
this is not the correct place for this.
Currently updating translatewiki.net codebase is annoying, as git does
It's being investigated, see #wikimedia-operations on irc.freenode.net.
Erik
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:34 PM, ENWP Pine wrote:
> Hi, I'm getting some 404 errors consistently when trying to load some
> English Wikipedia articles. Other pages load ok. Did something break?
>
> Pine
>
> __
I'm getting these errors too.
Judging by the chatter in #wikimedia-operations, this is being actively
looked in to.
Dan
On 29 May 2014 13:34, ENWP Pine wrote:
> Hi, I'm getting some 404 errors consistently when trying to load some
> English Wikipedia articles. Other pages load ok. Did somethi
Hi, I'm getting some 404 errors consistently when trying to load some English
Wikipedia articles. Other pages load ok. Did something break?
Pine
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https:
Yes it was for auto-reviewing new revisions. New revisions are seen as a
combination of (base revision, changes). If the base revision was reviewed
and the user is trusted, then so is the new revision. MW core had the
obvious cases of rollback and null edits, which are (base revision, no
changes).
Hi,
For the nth time, in #mediawiki, I've had someone ask how to be able to mark a
bug as resolved, or claim it, or mark it as a duplicate of another bug. I
conceptually know that this means "getting editbugs permissions" but it happens
so infrequently that I never know where to go.
Usually wh
My logging changes [0][1][2][3] are getting closer to being mergeable
(the first has already been merged). Tony Thomas' Swift Mailer change
[4] is also progressing. Both sets of changes introduce the concept of
specifying external library dependencies, both required and suggested,
to mediawiki/core
We will have to make Jenkins bot run composer install before running tests
for a start. Currently, jenkins wont be able to find the libraries and
the test fails
ref: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/135290.
Thanks,
Tony Thomas
FOSS@Amrita
"where there is a wifi, there is a way"
On Wed, May 28,
Hi,
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 11:57 -0700, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> That's a good question! I'm in SFO this week, so it's probably worth
> setting aside a day to resync and figure out what the next steps for
> the new PDF renderer are.
Any news (or a public test instance available)?
As I wrote, I'
19 matches
Mail list logo