Re: [Wikitech-l] Revision metadata as a service?

2014-11-10 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Yes, a failed piece of rotting [configuration] code on en.wiki is called "Pending changes"; this doesn't mean that the extension, used by over 200 wikis, has been affected in any way. Nemo ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org ht

[Wikitech-l] Please welcome Joaquín Oltra Hernández, Software Developer

2014-11-10 Thread Tomasz Finc
I am pleased to announce that Joaquín Oltra Hernández joining the WMF as a Software Engineer for the Mobile Web Team! In Joaquins own words ... --- I'm spanish, living in the sunny east coast. I've been working with web frontends, UIs and javascript for about 8 years. For the last year I've been

Re: [Wikitech-l] Announcing the MediaWiki-Vagrant Community Survey

2014-11-10 Thread Dan Duvall
I should have clarified that this version of the survey is meant for community contributors. Sorry to any WMF staff that filled this out (again). :) On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Dan Duvall wrote: > Calling all MediaWiki contributors! > > As many of you may know, there's a tool out there in t

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay

2014-11-10 Thread Faidon Liambotis
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:35:42PM +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > * "Advertised Bandwidth 3.3 MB/s", what does it mean and can it be > increased? As we do not set any advertised bandwidth in our configuration, the value in Atlas is the bandwidth observed by the network. We are still in a ram

[Wikitech-l] Announcing the MediaWiki-Vagrant Community Survey

2014-11-10 Thread Dan Duvall
Calling all MediaWiki contributors! As many of you may know, there's a tool out there in the MediaWiki ether called MediaWiki-Vagrant. Whether you know what it's all about, love it, hate it, or haven't a clue—no, it isn't a fork of our wiki platform for displaced San Franciscans—we want to hear fr

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay

2014-11-10 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Great! Thanks. * "Advertised Bandwidth 3.3 MB/s", what does it mean and can it be increased? * I see in puppet that there is at least some logging enabled. What is being logged and why? "The best policy is to keep no logs."

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread Antoine Musso
Le 10/11/2014 23:15, svetlana a écrit : > Nkansah Rexford wrote: >> Glad to know there's at least one freenode for Wikimedia. But if I may ask, >> it it official? It happens to be a sub domain of freenode. Not a bad idea, >> but was expecting to see something like freenode.Wikimedia.org or somethin

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread svetlana
Nkansah Rexford wrote: > Glad to know there's at least one freenode for Wikimedia. But if I may ask, > it it official? It happens to be a sub domain of freenode. Not a bad idea, > but was expecting to see something like freenode.Wikimedia.org or something > like that. Quote from the freenode websi

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread svetlana
Thought WMF already hosts one for freenode. There is only one TOR hidden service. On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, at 20:28, Pine W wrote: > Thanks for the note. Would it be within our mission scope to host a > Freenode server? We use Freenode a *lot* for public and private > communications. There have been p

[Wikitech-l] recent security breach for browserstack.com

2014-11-10 Thread Chris McMahon
The Wikimedia Foundation has an account with browserstack.com for cross-browser testing. I do not think it sees much use, but in case anyone is using the browserstack service, they had a security breach yesterday: https://twitter.com/browserstack Browserstack says it will publish details of the b

[Wikitech-l] VisualEditor monthly newsletter is now multilingual

2014-11-10 Thread Erica Litrenta
(Apologies for cross-posting.) Hi all, I'm glad to announce that the *monthly VisualEditor newsletter* was recently marked for translation for the first time: we had received several related community requests. The issue for September and October [0] was delivered in 10 languages to the editors w

Re: [Wikitech-l] Autosave drafts

2014-11-10 Thread Vito
I'll always love any idea starting from the botton, facing and eventually surviving to users' whims :D Vito Inviato con AquaMail per Android http://www.aqua-mail.com Il 10 novembre 2014 19:52:25 Derk-Jan Hartman ha scritto: How about when I wrap this up, I launch it as a Beta Feature.. ?

Re: [Wikitech-l] Autosave drafts

2014-11-10 Thread Derk-Jan Hartman
How about when I wrap this up, I launch it as a Beta Feature.. ? DJ > On 10 nov. 2014, at 17:30, Stryn@Wikimedia wrote: > > I would love to get autosave feature. > My browser has crashed so many times, so everytime when I'm writing > something longer, I have to use something like Notepad that

Re: [Wikitech-l] Feature request.

2014-11-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
The real-time collaboration mock ups that Pau created and we presented at Wikimania have a feature which is similar, where you can see who else is currently editing a given page (and be notified when another edit starts) even if you don't choose to start/join a collaborative editing session. But e

Re: [Wikitech-l] Autosave drafts

2014-11-10 Thread Stryn@Wikimedia
I would love to get autosave feature. My browser has crashed so many times, so everytime when I'm writing something longer, I have to use something like Notepad that can be easily saved anytime I want. *Stryn* 2014-11-10 0:25 GMT+02:00 Vito : > An online autosave with certain limitations would b

Re: [Wikitech-l] Our CAPTCHA is very unfriendly

2014-11-10 Thread Chris Steipp
On Sunday, November 9, 2014, Platonides wrote: > On 07/11/14 02:52, Jon Harald Søby wrote: > >> The main concern is obviously that it is really hard to read, but there >> are >> also some other issues, namely that all the fields in the user >> registration >> form (except for the username) are wi

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wikimedia-l] Recognition of the MediaWiki Stakeholder's Group

2014-11-10 Thread Quim Gil
Great news! Finally a formal group focused in MediaWiki for third parties, within the Wikimedia movement. Autonomous and connected. Now the sky is the limit of the memebers of this group. :) PS: Stakeholder's or Stakeholders? On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Nurunnaby Hasive wrote: > Welcome &

Re: [Wikitech-l] phabricator vagrant

2014-11-10 Thread Quim Gil
Hi Merlijn, thank you for your work! On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Merlijn van Deen wrote: > Yesterday, I adapted[2] the existing phabricator-tools[1] repository > (which is mean to quickly get phabricator running) to work (better) > for development. To use it, do the following: > Please co

[Wikitech-l] phabricator vagrant

2014-11-10 Thread Merlijn van Deen
Interested in helping out in improving https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/ ? Worried about getting phabricator set up for development? Not interested in installing MySQL? Now there is a solution! Phabricator-tools, only $0.00 (plus a few GB tax & storage) from github! [/tongue-in-cheek] Yesterday

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread Nkansah Rexford
Hello Antoine Thanks for pointing out. For some reason, I can't access the address. Maybe its down. Pings dont go through at all. Glad to know there's at least one freenode for Wikimedia. But if I may ask, it it official? It happens to be a sub domain of freenode. Not a bad idea, but was expectin

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Hi Pine, On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:28:54AM -0800, Pine W wrote: > Thanks for the note. Would it be within our mission scope to host a > Freenode server? We use Freenode a *lot* for public and private > communications. There have been previous discussions about WMF support for > upstream services,

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread Antoine Musso
Le 10/11/2014 10:28, Pine W a écrit : > Thanks for the note. Would it be within our mission scope to host a > Freenode server? We use Freenode a *lot* for public and private > communications. There have been previous discussions about WMF support for > upstream services, and WMF has been talking ab

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread Nkansah Rexford
Always thought Wikimedia has a freenode instance, as they do for etherpad. Well then, I think its about time. On Nov 10, 2014 9:29 AM, "Pine W" wrote: > Thanks for the note. Would it be within our mission scope to host a > Freenode server? We use Freenode a *lot* for public and private > communi

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay

2014-11-10 Thread Antoine Musso
Le 10/11/2014 10:10, Faidon Liambotis a écrit : > Hi, > > This is just a quick update that as of late October, WMF is officially > hosting a Tor relay: > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/DB19E709C9EDB903F75F2E6CA95C84D637B62A02 > > This is not an exit node, and it's just a small contribution

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tor relay, and freenode

2014-11-10 Thread Pine W
Thanks for the note. Would it be within our mission scope to host a Freenode server? We use Freenode a *lot* for public and private communications. There have been previous discussions about WMF support for upstream services, and WMF has been talking about offering non-monetary support to affiliate

[Wikitech-l] Tor relay

2014-11-10 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Hi, This is just a quick update that as of late October, WMF is officially hosting a Tor relay: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/DB19E709C9EDB903F75F2E6CA95C84D637B62A02 This is not an exit node, and it's just a small contribution to the network. Really - anyone can do it: https://www.eff.or