I’m still not entirely convinced that the GPLv2 allows more licenses than the
v3. Yeah, maybe in the case of extensions it’s OK, but I do not think it is
possible to add Apache code into MediaWiki core and still allow licensing
MediaWiki under both the v2 and the v3.
Maybe if legal can provide
[Apologies for cross-post]
As a reminder, on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 12:00 (noon) PST (20:00
UTC)[0] there will be the first of a weekly series of open triage meetings
about VisualEditor.
We will discuss the release criteria for VisualEditor, and jointly
prioritise the work of the team,
Hi!
And is also infeasible. For a web service. GPL is effectively weak
copyleft already; I think that's quite weak enough. (As I noted, there
is no actual evidence that permissive licenses secure more
This is very plausible, as the decision to contribute is rarely driven
by the license as a
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ellie Young eyo...@wikimedia.org
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:55 PM
Subject: [Wmfall] Wikimania Scholarship Application Deadline is Approaching!
To: wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org, Wikimania general list
wikimani...@lists.wikimedia.org, Staff All
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 21:25:16 Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
It's your choice to not participate in any project for any reason, but try
to understand that some people (such as myself) much prefer to work on
software that's truly free, rather than virally free.
I hope you
On 10 February 2015 at 23:19, Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact I would prefer to go to a less restrictive license, but that is
probably not worth the fight.
And is also infeasible. For a web service. GPL is effectively weak
copyleft already; I think that's quite weak
Hi I am getting js script errors in Metrolook skin. The error is in
$(document).click(function(e) {
if (!$(e.target).closest('#'+openDiv).length) {
toggleDiv(openDiv);
}
});
and error says Object expected.
Source code is at
https://git.wikimedia.org/summary/mediawiki%2Fskins%2FMetrolook and
