On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Johan Jönsson wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> The voting phase of the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey has now started. Read
> the proposals and support the ones you want to support to make the wikis
> better:
>
Maybe not a hard no, but I would rate the probability as somewhere around
1%.
If you really wanted to push this (with the understanding that its probably
not going anywhere) I would say make a report, comingup with a solid case
with a solid implementation plan, including:
* what is the fallback
Hey Andre,
On 10.12.2017 22:10, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 21:42 +0100, Ruben Kelevra wrote:
>> So... to break the current discussion down, there is no hard "we
>> don't want this format" yet shown up.
>>
>> What's the next step guys?
>
> Working on widespread FLIF support
Sadly Google stick to cheer for their WebP-crap, my ticket #539120 for
the chromium project dated back to late 2015, while there are some
supporters, the main reason was back then 'it's not yet finalized' which
isn't true anymore.
Since we need the Poly-flif stuff anyway - not any user uses the
On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 21:42 +0100, Ruben Kelevra wrote:
> So... to break the current discussion down, there is no hard "we
> don't want this format" yet shown up.
>
> What's the next step guys?
Working on widespread FLIF support among browsers/clients, to not
require JavaScript support in
So... to break the current discussion down, there is no hard "we
don't want this format" yet shown up.
What's the next step guys? Generate a feature request for MediaWiki
which enables FLIF as possible input-format and ships the poly-flif
JavaScript library for browsers which does not