-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
It's still Tuesday in my timezone, so here's this week's thread.
Noticed something neat or cool that someone did? Or is someone just
being awesome in general? Say thanks!
* Thanks to Krinkle and Krenair for cleaning up user JavaScript across
Wi
Hello,
This is the weekly update from the Search Platform team for the week
starting 2019-01-14.
As always, feedback and questions welcome.
== Discussions ==
=== Search ===
* Trey updated TextCat with models for detecting Russian typed on an
English keyboard and vice-versa, and UTF-8 Russian tex
Hi all!
This plugin has been removed entirely from Wikimedia Gerrit[0]. I know
of no one who intended to experiment with the plugin in its current form
so it is now removed.
I have created a task to track suggestions for this plugin's
improvement[1]. This task's scope is to track suggestions
On 18/01/2019 23:12, Pine W wrote:
I'm glad that this problematic change to communications was reverted.
I would like to suggest that this is the type of change that, when being
planned, should get a design review from a third party before coding
starts, should go through at least one RFC before
There’s an “unsubscribe” section on this link (which should be in the
footer of each email, though your client may hide it or make it less
prominent, not sure):
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Cheers,
Lucas
Am Di., 22. Jan. 2019 um 14:18 Uhr schrieb Ayushi Jain via Wikitec
I want to unsubscribe. Can't find any link on the emails sent by you.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
+1 to Niharika - the initial iteration caused some inconvenience, but I expect
subsequent iterations to be useful. Thank you Paladox!
> On 22 Jan 2019, at 13:09, Niharika Kohli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:12 PM Paladox via Wikitech-l <
> wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:12 PM Paladox via Wikitech-l <
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
> What your saying is making me think I’m wasting my time on improving this
> extension.
> Also other users that have spoken to me have thought this extension is
> great but could do with improvements
> […] "people who have worked on this code before" is an excellent metric by
> which to find people to review your code.
Sure. But this is neither what I wrote, nor what the plugin does, nor
what can be done programmatically in the first place, as you
conveniently pointed out yourself:
> […] we
I suggest discussing the implementation details on phabricator.
Moreover, I second Lucas point on the tone.
physikerwelt
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct
physikerwelt
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:43 PM Lucas Werkmeister
wrote:
>
> Am Di.,
Am Di., 22. Jan. 2019 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Chad :
> Dumb straw man.
>
can we avoid this tone? thanks
Who said these people have too much workload?
Um, Thiemo himself has said this? Are you going to tell him that he’s wrong
about his own workload?
The blame attribution has zero insight into ho
What your saying is making me think I’m wasting my time on improving this
extension.
Also other users that have spoken to me have thought this extension is great
but could do with improvements which I am doing. We need to think of new users
and how to improve there experence. The task was opene
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:05 AM Thiemo Kreuz
wrote:
> > Fundamentally broken sounds like a bit of a stretch.
>
> A process that annoys people based on nothing but the fact that they
> happened to be the last one touching a file *is* fundamentally broken.
> This is not how anyone should look for r
> Fundamentally broken sounds like a bit of a stretch.
A process that annoys people based on nothing but the fact that they
happened to be the last one touching a file *is* fundamentally broken.
This is not how anyone should look for reviewers, neither manually nor
automatically.
Here is a though
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 1/22/19 12:24 AM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> Yes, it's installed, but it doesn't seem to be actually used. The
> English Wikivoyage has a bunch of log entries of its usage, the
> last in 2015. Other Wikimedia sites have very few entries, or non
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 1/18/19 1:11 AM, Jaime Crespo wrote:
> One member of my team sadly left. Now he is pinged every time I
> upload a change, passively aggressive reminding him he used to work
> on this.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I think this is great to get atte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 1/18/19 6:11 AM, Tyler Cipriani wrote:
> In the interim, project-owners are able to opt-in to using the
> reviewers-by-blame plugin on a per-project basis on their project
> admin page in Gerrit.
I'm happy to volunteer any of the projects I
This discussion could do with less theatrics IMO.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
No, I added in a config so that it would disable automatically adding
reviewers instead relying on users to press “Suggest Reviewers” button.
On Tuesday, 22 January 2019, 08:11:23 GMT, Thiemo Kreuz
wrote:
> […] im adding that functionality to reviewers-by-blame.
I'm afraid I don't und
Yes, it's installed, but it doesn't seem to be actually used. The English
Wikivoyage has a bunch of log entries of its usage, the last in 2015. Other
Wikimedia sites have very few entries, or none at all.
My guess, and please do correct me if I'm wrong, is that it was used on
Wikitravel or Wikivoy
Fundamentally broken sounds like a bit of a stretch.
In fact, it was probably working quite well for our less-trafficked
repositories. But the issues identified must be fixed and decent file
exclusion rules written before it goes back on for the active ones.
-Chad
On Jan 22, 2019 12:11 AM, "Thie
AFAIR it was at very risk of breaking the Internet, so it went into a limbo
of being installed but never used.
Vito
Il giorno mar 22 gen 2019 alle ore 08:46 Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Is the UserMerge extension actually used on Wikimedia sites?
>
> As f
Hello,
UserMerge as it is right now is unusable for Wikimedia sites, and thus no
user (bureaucrats, etc.) is allowed to use it. The extension is now up for
a Code Stewarship Review to decide what to do with it <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204747>, and I am proposing to undeploy
the extensi
> Is the UserMerge extension actually used on Wikimedia sites?
I don't know if people *use* it, but according to
https://wikiapiary.com/wiki/Extension:UserMerge it is installed on
more than a thousand wikis, including all Wikimedia wikis.
Best
Thiemo
_
> […] im adding that functionality to reviewers-by-blame.
I'm afraid I don't understand. Does this mean all the issues that make
the plugin send passive-aggressive, misattributed spam will still be
in place, possibly hitting peoples inboxes again any time somebody
decides it would be a good idea t
25 matches
Mail list logo
