On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:19 PM David Barratt wrote:
> However, there will have to be a significant number of major changes before
> that can be a reality.
>
Which kind of changes?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
In general I would prefer to keep vulgar language out of the projects, as
it doesn't bring anything positive.
Research shows that swearing causes stress [1], and there are many ways of
showing dissatisfaction without using coarse language.
For instance, I would appreciate if there would be more
meeting held under the Chatham House Rule, anyone who comes to the
> meeting is free to use information from the discussion, but is not allowed
> to reveal who made any comment. It is designed to increase openness of
> discussion." See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House_Rule
@Nemo: It could be that the priority change was not seen as aggressive, and
probably it was not initially as we have the "be bold" tradition. However,
that changes as the issue heats up and becomes an edit war. In this case it
didn't get to that point (less than 3 reverts, although the reverts
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 9:38 AM Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easy to just log out and read any task (or even use
> incognito mode/private browsing in the browser)? It is certainly a small
> inconvenience, but I am not sure how it is very important, given a very
> simple workaround.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 7:26 AM Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> Pointing out trollish brehaviour is positive help for self-correction.
>
What you call "trollish behaviour" is to "provoke others (chiefly on the
Internet) for their own personal amusement or to cause disruption". Unless
there is
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Andre Klapper
wrote:
> The source website is linked from the date header.
>
I'm aware of that, but in my opinion that is not visible enough.
> That's a question for the blog maintainers that you could file at
>
Hi Daniel,
I like the new design, however I am missing some information about the
source of each post. Would it be possible to add the source website to each
post?
And another more general question I have is, could the Planet be linked
from the Wikimedia blog? I feel that it is quite hidden now,
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your well-intentioned letter. Do you know about Wikidata and the
recent developments to support machine-readable Lexicographical data? I
would like to invite you to take a look at:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data
The system is still at its early
Hi Daniel,
The usual procedure is explained here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mass_account_creation
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Mass_account_creation
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Six-account_limit
Normally to request a temporary lift of the IP cap, they
<yastrak...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> Micru, thanks, I think Datasets sounds like a good name too!
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM David Cuenca Tudela <dacu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <
> > bjor...@wikime
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
> wrote:
>
> > Gift season! We have launched structured data on Commons, available from
> > all wikis.
> >
>
> I was momentarily
I also find that it is quite hidden, wouldn't it be better to show it by
default? As it is now there is no hint that the link will open the graph.
Cheers,
Micru
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Yuri Astrakhan
wrote:
> he.wiki has already enabled it by inserting
Amir,
First of all a big thank you as a speaker of Catalan and fervent advocate
of minoritary languages.
OTOH, I would like to bring awareness to the topic of translation engine.
Apertium is no longer supported as a GsoC project, I guess the project will
keep alive but it worries me that
It seems that the Visual Editor age can now be entered fully :)
Looking forward to the Wikisource adaptation of Visual Editor!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:34 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fantastic, many thanks to all involved!!
On Mar 20, 2015 1:15 AM, Gabriel Wicke
Wouldn't be better to have nested projects? GsoC might need a project per
year with subprojects for each student to manage their task, is project
nesting possible on Phabricator?
And what about sister projects? Will each one have a project?
Thanks
Micru
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Quim Gil
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Tagging describes Phabricator projects a lot better than nesting. In
Phabricator, projects are tags and tags are projects. This means that even
if the subproject concept is officially missing today, you can organize
your work
After reading your blog post, I must agree with this:
And I'd like to [...] exclude destructive communication from my life (yes,
there's some amount of burnout on toxic people and entitlement).
I wish that in your new environment you find a better environment to grow
professionally with less
Feedback in a Spanish social news aggregator
http://www.meneame.net/story/wikimedia-pone-prueba-prototipo-diseno-wikipedia
Some relevant comments:
- Brandon is one of the most brilliant persons I ever met, and he brings
us the interface of the future Wikipedia
- thanks to this I discovered that
matma@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:00:04 +0200, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sometimes while not logged in I try to access my Watchlist and then the
Not logged in page appears. It is quite useless since then you have to
click again to go to the Log in page
Sometimes while not logged in I try to access my Watchlist and then the
Not logged in page appears. It is quite useless since then you have to
click again to go to the Log in page. Wouldn't it be better to just
redirect to the log in page instead of showing that dumb Not logged in
page?
Or
I like it and I hope it gets to the point where it can be deployed as beta.
And that right panel looks a perfect place for users to place some gadgets
of their choice. That would be wonderful!
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I want to suggest
Hi Sumana,
I hope you are well and getting ready for wikimania? :)
There is this rfc on mediawiki that I did everything possible to promote,
to gather feedback from 3rd parties, etc. but now it is all done. From this
point on I cannot bring it any further.
What to do in this cases? Mark it as
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dan Andreescu dandree...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I like Visual:, any +1s? +2s?
I give it a +0.5 :) I also like Render but its meaning has become too
attached to 3d graphics...
Anyhow if we have a Visual and a VisualData namespace, they could be
associated to each
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.ukwrote:
Definitely agree that we needed something like this. There's a lot of
confusion about what Wikidata is for, and what is and isn't appropriate for
it - both from outsiders and from within the Wikimedia community. I've
Hi,
During the Zürich Hackathon I met several people that looked for solutions
about how to integrate external open datasets into our projects (mainly
Wikipedia, Wikidata). Since Wikidata is not the right tool to manage them
(reasons explained in the RFC as discussed during the Wikidata session),
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, How can I put this open data on Wikidata is a
question that I have been asked many times, this page was needed.
Thanks for your comment!
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Samuel Klein
As a continuation to the community wish expressed last year to start a
musical score transcription project [1], I'm investigating what is needed
to make it happen.
The biggest hurdle seems to be how to separate content from layout. On the
one hand users should be able to define which part to work
I hope that you can reserve some interesting topics for people who arrive
on Fri night/Sat morning :)
Thanks!
Micru
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Wikimedia Hackathon participants, please have a look at
Hi Sumana,
Thanks for moving the RFC forward! I hope some MW experts can join and
provide their very necessary advice!
Cheers,
Micru
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Micru's Associated namespaces RfC is up for discussion this week.
Hi Eugene,
you already can upload scores to Commons and transcribe them on Wikisource
as agreed on this RFC
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Musical_score_transcription_project_proposal
Thanks,
Micru
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Eugene Zelenko
, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Eugene,
you already can upload scores to Commons and transcribe them on
Wikisource
as agreed on this RFC
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Musical_score_transcription_project_proposal
My point is to share such transcribes between
Hi,
When I type bach on the top right en.wp search box, I only have the
option to select Bach from the list. This option however takes me to
Bạch (with a dot under the a).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%E1%BA%A1ch
However when I type the url I'm taken to the right article
:
It works for me.
On Monday, March 17, 2014, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When I type bach on the top right en.wp search box, I only have the
option to select Bach from the list. This option however takes me to
Bạch (with a dot under the a).
https://en.wikipedia.org
Hi,
I have started drafting a RFC to associate namespaces:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Associated_namespaces
Comments and proposals are very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Micru
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Hi Inderpreet,
Welcome and thanks for reaching out, there is definitely the need of a 3d
viewer for mediawiki and brl-cad could add some of the needed features.
Probably you could contact Bryan Davis, since he offered himself as GsoC
mentor for such a project:
for sharing. Do you think it would be worthwhile to add OAuth to the
list?
Cheers,
Micru
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 08/21/2013 08:35 AM, Mark wrote:
On 8/16/13 11:48 AM, David Cuenca wrote:
A manual system where a group of reviewers assign badges to major
In Wikidata there is an open bug to implement badges (see email below by
Lydia), with the open question if this should be handled by the Mediawiki
software itself or in some other way. Template: Link FA and
Template:Link GA is the system currently used in all Wikipedias [1]
In addition to this,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:58 AM, John Erling Blad jeb...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't use votes... ;)
I think Lydia was referring to the votes on the bugzilla bug page, 14 votes
so far :)
If we forget about the implementation of badges and discuss the
contributions; there are no single
of is dimension reduction and measuring path length, but
that too fail for some combos of vandalism/reverts.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:08 PM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:58 AM, John Erling Blad jeb...@gmail.com
wrote:
We don't use votes... ;)
I
Wikimania:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=D8pwr-Uizf4http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8pwr-Uizf4
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:04:44 -0400
From: David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia developers
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.**orgwikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
I think this is going
I think this is going to be great news for WorkingWiki
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:WorkingWiki
Cheers,
Micru
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
quote name=Dirk Hünniger date=2013-08-04 time=10:05:35 +0200
Hello,
I made a new debian
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:30 PM, C. Scott Ananian
canan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
This statement seems rather defeatist to me. Step one of a machine
translation effort should be to provide tools to annotate parallel texts in
the various wikis, and to edit and maintain their parallelism.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:39 AM, C. Scott Ananian
canan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
My main point was just that there is a chicken-and-egg problem here. You
assume that machine translation can't work because we don't have enough
parallel texts. But, to the extent that machine-aided translation
After Erik's email about supporting open source machine translation [1],
I've been researching options and having talks with several machine
translation researchers about what would be the best way to integrate MT
into Wikipedia. Unfortunately I couldn't find a single solution that, on
its own,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:34 AM, John Erling Blad jeb...@gmail.com wrote:
There are good reasons why users want to turn off VE and the most
important reason are not what most people in the thread seems to
think. Users that have learned to use a crappy direct editing user
interface tend to be
Dan,
Great move with the extension, I think it as good way to integrate the GWT
into Commons. I would like to make you aware of this proposal to move
Commons towards linked data:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikidata_for_media_info
Obviously this move would simplify the work for you
I'm glad that Tim is bringing some facts and numbers that back up what the
community is demanding.
To do otherwise will be to play tug-of-war which will lead to an even worse
outcome.
Besides of enabling the preference, a good approach would be to activate or
deactivate that preference depending
Good idea, it could also help to know which are the links more used in a
disambiguation page to sort them by importance.
Micru
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Nicolas Vervelle nverve...@gmail.comwrote:
Interesting idea...
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com
Nice design! Will it work across projects?
Micru
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Those are messages in which the reader has been mentioned.
On Jul 14, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Aarti K. Dwivedi ellydwivedi2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Some usernames
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
Oh, I wasn't aware of this wikisource specificity? Is that related to a
central djvu repository?
No, it is only related to the existence of a central project. However Matt
Flaschen says that mediawiki.org could
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
Interesting, but why make a central code repository only for
Wikisource ?
There are several reasons for this.
- trying to support all projects at once might be too much for a grantee to
do in 3 months.
- it
. This could be the first experiment of having a
centralized repository of modules.
What do you think of this? Would be anyone available to mentor an Outreach
Program for Women project?
Thanks,
David Cuenca --Micru
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l
Hi Brandon,
Thanks for the announce and also for the effort of letting the door open
for suggestions and feedback. I regard Flow as an excellent tool for
centralizing all communications in one spot and I really hope user
involvement is as high as this tool would deserve. So far the test page
Bug report: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48538
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:33 AM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
At ca-ws we have started creating musical scores and we have found out
that when transcluding two pages into one, it is only possible to generate
two
Hi,
At ca-ws we have started creating musical scores and we have found out that
when transcluding two pages into one, it is only possible to generate two
independent audio files instead of one with the whole score.
Example with two pages
Excellent news! Congratulations to everyone involved!
Cheers,
David
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Parth Srivastav
srivastav.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Quim
Great news, Congrats to the entire team
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Rahul Maliakkal rahul14...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Quim
Hi Anthony,
Your proposal seems quite suitable to annotate texts in Wikisource, since
the text is constant and you will not have problems using the highlighted
text as anchor.
Another participant has suggested storing the annotation as JSON in a new
namespace Annotation:, I think there is a
Brion,
Have you checked if Vexflow renders svg properly on you Macbook/Ubuntu?
Maybe you can get some ideas from its code.
http://vexflow.com/
Thanks for working on this,
David --Micru
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I've done a little weekend hacking
Hi Mathieu, hi James,
There is this GsoC proposal that plans to explore the integration of an
annotation system in Mediawiki:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rjain/Proposal-Prototyping-inline-comments
The idea is to see how well and in which ways the OKFN Annotator could be
deployed:
I have started a page in Meta to discuss the options of either creating a
Wikisource version dedicated to musical scores or an independent project
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Musical_score_transcription_project_proposal
Micru
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:34 AM, John
This is really amazing! Specially for Wikisource :-)
Is multi-page score transclusion with Extension:Proofread page able to
generate a global midi/score file or each page has to be treated as an
independent entity?
Micru
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Dear all,
I have started a new RFC with some proposals for the interproject links and
you can add more if you want.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Interproject_links_interface
It has been a long standing issue and one of the most voted enhancements in
Bugzilla
Hi Cheng,
As you say there are many recommendation systems, some of them already work
or used to work with wikipedia (like StumbleThru) or just to find
interesting articles (like reddit.com/r/wikipedia ).
In my opinion those systems are better developed externally because if not
done right, they
Hi there,
I'm trying to find the Special:ActiveUsers page that used to show activity
statistics.
Where did it go? Has it been replaced by something better?
Thanks,
Micru
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi!
I'm looking for a co-mentor for this project:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mentorship_programs/Possible_projects#Merge_proofread_text_back_into_Djvu_files
There is already someone that would be giving guidance on Tesseract OCR,
now I'm looking for a second mentor to advise on Mediawiki
66 matches
Mail list logo