Hello All!
PolyGerrit no longer supports Internet Explorer. It never really worked so now
the offical status is "not supported".
You can use alternative browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Opera and Microsft Edge.
GWTUI will support internet explorer. Though GWTUI has been removed in newer
versions
Hello,
With the upgrade to 2.16, PolyGerrit will become the default UI.
PolyGerrit is a rewritten UI based on Polymer [1] in Gerrit that is available
from Gerrit 2.14, you can access this through ?polygerrit=1 or using the footer
where it says "Switch to New UI". Note that you can still switch
It's now official that cloning over /p/ is no longer supported,
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/homepage/+/223220
On Tuesday, 30 April 2019, 20:43:24 BST, Paladox
wrote:
Hello,
In Gerrit 2.16 PolyGerrit takes over the /p/ url so cloning no longer works
over that URL. Please
Hello,
In Gerrit 2.16 PolyGerrit takes over the /p/ url so cloning no longer works
over that URL. Please convert to using /r/.
/p/ is completely optional in Gerrit anyways so it's a matter of changing /r/p/
to just /r/ (you can update your config with the updated url by doing "sed -i
-e
Hi, with the future of Gerrit comes a bright future. Gerrit PolyGerrit has
changed to Google Germany PolyGerrit team (created in january). Upstream are
planning to ramp up development of PolyGerrit very soon. Gerrit has just had
3.0 branched within the last 2 hours! Which means that is going to
The watchlist should be in All-Users. If someone removed your watchlist you
can clone that repo. Then in .git/config change refs/heads to just refs/*. Then
it should show some refs (I forget which one you check out so you should try
them all) you can use git log to see if someone git committed
PolyGerrit now supports cherry picking changes onto of other changes (as of
2.16.6 (not released yet)) (i did that change!).
PolyGerrit is also gaining support for cherry picking changes even with merge
conflicts (also done by me)!
Also we are making CI comments pretty in PolyGerrit, see
-status/+/214812
This also uses zuul v3 colours over zuul v2 for the percentage bar and the
labels. So this update will make things even sweeter! :)
On Monday, 4 February 2019, 17:14:27 GMT, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
Thank you both for the nice comments! The plugin will be coming
ci comments can be made pretty again with
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T215658#4940198 (ill be working on getting it
added to gerrit.wikimedia.org) I just want to play to see if we can make it
more prettier then through GWTUI.
Looks like https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F28163501 (from
.
On Friday, 8 February 2019, 20:49:21 GMT, Daniel Kinzler
wrote:
Oh. Oooohhh. Thank you James, you just made my life so much easier!
Am 08.02.19 um 14:42 schrieb James Forrester:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 11:35, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>
>> Am 28.01.19 um 19:25 schrieb Paladox via Wikite
8
February 2019, 19:43:27 GMT, James Forrester wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 11:35, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Am 28.01.19 um 19:25 schrieb Paladox via Wikitech-l:
> Hi, what would you like to see in gerrit or improved?
* I would like to be able to set a cut-off date for my dashboard. E.g. &q
PM Gergo Tisza wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:26 PM Paladox via Wikitech-l <
> wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi, what would you like to see in gerrit or improved?
>
>
> Thanks for all your work on Gerrit! Some things that IMO would be useful:
&g
owards modernity! I'm looking forward to enjoying the plugin…
>
> -Adam
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:58 AM Paladox via Wikitech-l <
> wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi, i am pleased to announce that the zuul-status plugin is now available
> > fo
We can create a plugin for this (but would have to use a different account on
phabricator that surpasses mailing like the Phabricator maintenance account.)
On Friday, 1 February 2019, 18:32:01 GMT, Derick Alangi
wrote:
Hi,
A live example can be something like this:
Hi, i am pleased to announce that the zuul-status plugin is now available for
gerrit 2.16+.
This plugin integrates the zuul status json response into gerrit displaying the
jobs lined up and running. It's similar to how you would see it on
https://integration.wikimedia.org/zuul/ apart from it
so be useful with other commands like “check
> experimental”.)
>
> Am Di., 29. Jan. 2019 um 01:26 Uhr schrieb Paladox via Wikitech-l <
> wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org>:
>
> > Hi, what would you like to see in gerrit or improved? I've been working
> > been working on dev
Hi, what would you like to see in gerrit or improved? I've been working been
working on developing a plugin that pull's in zuul's status into PolyGerrit.
See the running demo at https://imgur.com/a/uBk2oxQ . Im also planning on
adding "recheck" and "check experimental" as buttons to
Hi, i am pleased to say that gerrit.wikimedia.org PolyGerrit theme has been
updated to match timeless (blue/red/green) instead of the plain grey.
this is what it looks like: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F28019595 in 2.15
and in 2.16: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F28019604
Thanks to
What your saying is making me think I’m wasting my time on improving this
extension.
Also other users that have spoken to me have thought this extension is great
but could do with improvements which I am doing. We need to think of new users
and how to improve there experence. The task was
No, I added in a config so that it would disable automatically adding
reviewers instead relying on users to press “Suggest Reviewers” button.
On Tuesday, 22 January 2019, 08:11:23 GMT, Thiemo Kreuz
wrote:
> […] im adding that functionality to reviewers-by-blame.
I'm afraid I don't
Change is now available at:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/plugins/reviewers-by-blame/+/210812
and
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/plugins/reviewers-by-blame/+/211052
On Monday, 21 January 2019, 19:46:41 GMT, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
Nope, im adding
Nope, im adding that functionality to reviewers-by-blame.
Unless y'all want a plugin where you can define reviewers each repo and a user
can press "Suggest Reviewers", but it would probably be best to use
Reviewers-By-Blame once all the feedback has been addressed.
On Monday, 21 January
FYI i have a working prototype working ("Suggest Reviewer") button.
On Monday, 21 January 2019, 16:32:35 GMT, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
I’m currently working on addressing all the feedback as fast as I can.
I honestly think this extension is great especially for new use
I’m currently working on addressing all the feedback as fast as I can.
I honestly think this extension is great especially for new users, who do not
know they need reviewers or who would review there change. Granted this
extension has some problems hence why feature requests were filed against
"should get a design review from a third party before coding starts" what do
you mean by that?
Also may i remind you that gerrit is not a encyclopedia, it's a code review
system.
So what ever process is on the encyclopedia is not the same here.
Also please can we leave the threats out. It
I've forwarded jynus feedback upstream at
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=10337
On Friday, 18 January 2019, 15:01:09 GMT, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
The patch i linked in my other email does what you are all suggesting :) (opt
out per project).
If done
The patch i linked in my other email does what you are all suggesting :) (opt
out per project).
If done through All-Projects it will opt you out of all projects.
On Friday, 18 January 2019, 14:44:50 GMT, Daniel Kinzler
wrote:
Am 18.01.19 um 15:25 schrieb Jaime Crespo:
> Let me suggest
I’ve been working on a opt out (blacklist) in the plugin, see
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/plugins/reviewers-by-blame/+/210812
On Friday, 18 January 2019, 09:39:55 GMT, Gergo Tisza
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:58 PM Giuseppe Lavagetto <
glavage...@wikimedia.org>
Hi, if you like the header from (
https://gerrit-new.wmflabs.org/r/q/status:open ) and would like it applied to
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/ please +1
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/482379/
Community consensus is required before it can be merged.
I must note that with the branching of 2.16, it means that GWTUI is going
away. With the removal of GWTUI in
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/gerrit/+/116790
On Tuesday, 16 October 2018, 16:30:53 BST, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
Upstream have just branched 2.16 with a rc
Upstream have just branched 2.16 with a rc release a few hours away! So a
stable release should be done shortly with all the improvements to polygerrit's
ui and a inline editor too!
On Friday, 5 October 2018, 19:26:30 BST, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
I have filed it upstream
Hi, with https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/operations/puppet/+/464907/ being
merged. We are a step closer to enabling avatars.
The only changes left to do is
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/operations/puppet/+/456437/ and also
installing the plugin.
You can begin uploading your avatars to
ywikibot/core/+/463061/5/tests/library_tests/__init__.py#1
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:39 AM Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
>
> Hi, i am collecting feedback for Gerrit's New UI called PolyGerrit. It's
> possible to use PolyGerrit on gerrit.wikimedia.org since 2.14. The new UI has
> recently
Upstream just posted this
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/repo-discuss/yON4C-hIk-o for PolyGerrit
plans in 2.16 / 3.0.
So it's confirmed that the planned removal of GWTUI will be in 3.0.
On Thursday, 4 October 2018, 19:35:46 BST, Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
Yep avatars
Yep avatars are not yet enabled, but we have implemented the backend to
support it.
Changes that are left to merge
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/439808 and
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/456437
What do you mean by "URLs are hard to get right due to
1withhttps://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/services/parsoid/+/463559/6/lib/wt2html/TokenTransformManager.js?polygerrit=0(after
setting "ignore whitespace" to "all" in the gear-shaped preference menu in the
top-right). --scott
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:09 PM Paladox via Wikitech-l
wrote:
In PolyGerrit on the master branch, we can now define themes for users to try.
I haven't tried building a theme yet that allows users to switch between themes.
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018, 23:29:09 BST, Thiemo Kreuz
wrote:
Paladox wrote:
> i am collecting feedback for Gerrit's New
is: not perfect, but about a thousand times better than
the old ui.
Collapsible sections in the dashboard would be very helpful, and GerritBot
should not post anything about changes that are marked WIP. That's about the
biggest issues I have.
Am 03.10.2018 um 23:09 schrieb Paladox via Wikitech-l
Point 1: Upstream are running the master branch of gerrit. So as soon as 2.16
is branched and released then a point release is done we will be able to
upgrade to it on gerrit.wikimedia.org.
Point 2: Same as above. That feature will roll out to gerrit.wikimedia.org as
soon as we upgrade.
Point
For point1, there is now status badges on change screens. On the dashboard
text is highlighted to tell if it's merged/abandoned/wip/private.
For point 2, upstream have implemented that which will be part of 2.16.
For point 3 they changed it on smaller screens so it would take less space (i
Hi, i am collecting feedback for Gerrit's New UI called PolyGerrit. It's
possible to use PolyGerrit on gerrit.wikimedia.org since 2.14. The new UI has
recently been made the default upstream. The Old UI is going away in the next
release after 2.16. Upstream have given PolyGerrit another update
Hi, just wanted to note that google translate is translating she as a he.
Unless they used the wrong word. In any case google's translated it wrong.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en=es=en=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnet.com%2Fes%2Fnoticias%2Fwikipedia-wikimedia-nuria-ruiz%2F
On
, at least of commit message, but I'd
appreciate editing files. It is slower to download a patch, amend locally and
push back.
It may be I'm blind, so no task yet, but because this is going to move forward,
I'm asking :).
Martin
Dne čt 2. srp 2018 23:30 uživatel Paladox via Wikitech-l
napsal:
Hi
Hi, i got approval by releng to do this. I have set the date to next monday
(06/08/2018).
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T196812#4474742
On Tuesday, 12 June 2018, 18:10:49 BST, Paladox
wrote:
Delaying until after the sre offsite.
On Tuesday, 12 June 2018, 17:42:02 BST,
44 matches
Mail list logo
