Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] need for an app? (was: Future platforms, devices, and consumers)

2014-08-18 Thread Nuria Ruiz
Offline storage is hard in a browser, as you pointed out; that's too much
detail for me to understand quickly, and I have no comment yet. In
principle, such concern is valid.
Even the w3 held a working group for a while that was around how broken app
cache was (http://www.w3.org/community/fixing-appcache/)

It is still broken and been so for many years, well documented since 2011:
http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/papers/Facebook.html




On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:33 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:

 Dmitry Brant wrote:
  The fact that you don't see the benefits of the native app over the
 mobile
  website is simply an indication that we still have a lot of work to do
 with
  the apps, which we are excited to do.

 Partly this is because you don't support my mobile platform.

 Dmitry Brant wrote:
  But, is it a waste of effort to bring a truly integrated, seamless
  Wikipedia experience to our users' mobile devices?  I don't think so.
  Nor
  is it a waste of effort for the WMF to be seen as a driving force in
 mobile
  design and mobile user experience.

 I was assuming that integration and being seamless are easily doable from
 a web browser.

 Offline storage is hard in a browser, as you pointed out; that's too much
 detail for me to understand quickly, and I have no comment yet. In
 principle, such concern is valid.

 Documenting extra differences and shortcomings of web browsers could be a
 nice task.

 svetlana

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] need for an app? (was: Future platforms, devices, and consumers)

2014-08-16 Thread Dan Garry
On 16 August 2014 00:29, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:

 We don't need apps.


Read this to find out why you're wrong:
http://gigaom.com/2014/08/01/wikipedias-new-apps-are-good-for-you-but-theyre-even-better-for-the-developing-world/

Dan

-- 
Dan Garry
Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] need for an app? (was: Future platforms, devices, and consumers)

2014-08-16 Thread svetlana
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, at 00:18, Dan Garry wrote:
 On 16 August 2014 00:29, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
 
  We don't need apps.
 
 
 Read this to find out why you're wrong:
 http://gigaom.com/2014/08/01/wikipedias-new-apps-are-good-for-you-but-theyre-even-better-for-the-developing-world/
 
 Dan

Why not use in-browser offline storage?
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/features/storage

[then you're not missing out people who have neither android nor ios]

svetlana

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] need for an app? (was: Future platforms, devices, and consumers)

2014-08-16 Thread Yuvi Panda
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:40 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
 Why not use in-browser offline storage?
 http://www.html5rocks.com/en/features/storage

One of my favorite articles:
http://alistapart.com/article/application-cache-is-a-douchebag


-- 
Yuvi Panda T
http://yuvi.in/blog

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] need for an app? (was: Future platforms, devices, and consumers)

2014-08-16 Thread svetlana
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, at 10:04, Dan Garry wrote:
 On 16 August 2014 00:29, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
 
  We don't need apps. We need mobile websites which work as good as an app
  does.
  Oh, the waste of effort.
 
 
 It appears to me like you have issues with this project that go way beyond
 what I can help you with. I suggest you take it up with the senior
 management. I won't be responding to this thread further.
 
 Dan

That is OK, you and Yuvi Panda highlighted some important points.
Thanks to both - I'll follow-up if I find solution to the application cache 
issues raised in the blog post linked earlier.

svetlana

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] need for an app? (was: Future platforms, devices, and consumers)

2014-08-16 Thread svetlana
Dmitry Brant wrote:
 The fact that you don't see the benefits of the native app over the mobile
 website is simply an indication that we still have a lot of work to do with
 the apps, which we are excited to do.

Partly this is because you don't support my mobile platform.

Dmitry Brant wrote:
 But, is it a waste of effort to bring a truly integrated, seamless
 Wikipedia experience to our users' mobile devices?  I don't think so.  Nor
 is it a waste of effort for the WMF to be seen as a driving force in mobile
 design and mobile user experience.

I was assuming that integration and being seamless are easily doable from a web 
browser.

Offline storage is hard in a browser, as you pointed out; that's too much 
detail for me to understand quickly, and I have no comment yet. In principle, 
such concern is valid.

Documenting extra differences and shortcomings of web browsers could be a nice 
task.

svetlana

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l