Krinkle krinklemail at gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure we should implement collapsible sections for desktop.
If built and instrumented, one may find that users use it a fair bit and
it may be better-than-nothing as
solution for certain use cases. But I don't think collapsible sections
would
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:20 PM, quiddity pandiculat...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Re: birds eye view - I really like this idea, taken to the 'completism'
level...
A number of text/code editors, have a minimap attached to the side.
Il 29/12/2014 12:42, Prateek Saxena ha scritto:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Krinklekrinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
Our table of contents is in desperate need of improvement. Having that be more
accessible throughout the reading experience would be a big step forward[1]
(much like the
I agree with you.
Eallan
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:57:44 + (UTC)
From: Thomas Mulhall thomasmulhall...@yahoo.com
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] A new extension of content tree about
Wikipedia
Message-ID
(I've CC'd the design-list, for all of these ideas. Design: please see the
earlier part of this thread (7 msgs) for more context, at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-December/079793.html)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure we
Jon Robson jdlrobson at gmail.com writes:
Okay I had a long hard think about this.
I would suggest the following EventLogging experiment on the mobile website:
Question to answer: If section collapsing is provided to users in such
a way that sections are open by default, do users find the
Why not add it to the core of mediawiki including the mobile version.
On Friday, 19 December 2014, 16:40, Eallan Wong h.yi...@gmail.com wrote:
Jon Robson jdlrobson at gmail.com writes:
Okay I had a long hard think about this.
I would suggest the following EventLogging experiment
I'm not sure we should implement collapsible sections for desktop.
If built and instrumented, one may find that users use it a fair bit and it may
be better-than-nothing as solution for certain use cases. But I don't think
collapsible sections would be an adequate feature for those use cases.
Okay I had a long hard think about this.
I would suggest the following EventLogging experiment on the mobile website:
Question to answer: If section collapsing is provided to users in such
a way that sections are open by default, do users find the ability to
collapse sections a useful feature?
Thank you for your reply.
So how to take the sensible test?
Eallan
Jon Robson jdlrobson at gmail.com writes:
I think we should explore this. I don't think this is about extra
clicks... On tablets like desktop we expand sections by default but
__allow___ them to be collapsible. It would be
I think we should explore this. I don't think this is about extra
clicks... On tablets like desktop we expand sections by default but
__allow___ them to be collapsible. It would be interesting to add some
event logging to see how widely used that feature is on tablet.
It could thus also be useful
Hi all!
I am thinking about a new idea about a content tree extension of
web/desktop/computer Wiki. When I use mobile phone to access website of
Wikipedia, I can fold and unfold a content item of the content tree. That's
very convenient. However, when I use computer to access Wiki, there is no
On Dec 9, 2014 1:35 PM, Eallan h.yi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I am thinking about a new idea about a content tree extension of
web/desktop/computer Wiki. When I use mobile phone to access website of
Wikipedia, I can fold and unfold a content item of the content tree.
That's
very
Im unsure that would be wanted on the desktop wiki. Desktop doesnt have
the
space constraints of mobile, and extra clicks should usually be avoided
if
possible.
--bawilff
This feature will not add extra clicks, because you can set unfolded as the
default status, when you want to fold some
14 matches
Mail list logo
