Re: [Wikitech-l] ArchCom Status & Meeting Minutes, WD3

2017-01-19 Thread MZMcBride
Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote: >On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Kinzler < >daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de> wrote: >> ** Related discussion about whether new features can require services >> serparate from MediaWiki core. > >That seems like it would be a decent RFC at some point. Agreed. There

Re: [Wikitech-l] ArchCom Status & Meeting Minutes, WD3

2017-01-19 Thread Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Kinzler < daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > ** Related discussion about whether new features can require services > serparate > from MediaWiki core. > That seems like it would be a decent RFC at some point. -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Senior Software

Re: [Wikitech-l] ArchCom Status & Meeting Minutes, WD3

2017-01-18 Thread Daniel Kinzler
Am 18.01.2017 um 21:45 schrieb MZMcBride: > Daniel Kinzler wrote: >> * ArchCom is considering changes to the RFC process. Discussion is >> ongoing. > > Where is discussion ongoing? Internally. We have to decide on a MO. I'm sharing this summary here to keep you posted, and give an opportunity

Re: [Wikitech-l] ArchCom Status & Meeting Minutes, WD3

2017-01-18 Thread MZMcBride
Daniel Kinzler wrote: >* ArchCom is considering changes to the RFC process. Discussion is >ongoing. Where is discussion ongoing? >Key points: >** More focus on discussion in Phabricator >** More leight weight process for “small” RFCs >** ArchCom to focus more on review, less ond process >** IRC

[Wikitech-l] ArchCom Status & Meeting Minutes, WD3

2017-01-18 Thread Daniel Kinzler
Hi all! Here are the minutes from this week's ArchCom meeting. You can also find the minutes at . See also the ArchCom status page at and the RFC board