Le Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:58:55 +0100, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com
a écrit:
In your post, you ask whether the employee owns the copyright on their
own work, or whether WMF does. I don't know this for sure, because
it's not explicitly mentioned in my contract, but I believe it's owned
by
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:47 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
Commons folk doesn't magically delete anything unless there is a
reason, nor do they instantly delete in most cases. If peoples uploads
are continently getting tagged for deletion, They should look at why
they are getting
On 04/01/12 20:53, Gregory Varnum wrote:
I know that's what they're SUPPOSE to do - but I've heard tales
of other issues as well. (...)
I tend to agree it shouldn't be necessary - but given people's
concerns about the importance of the files - figure it's at least
worth a try. :) Plus I
On 04.01.2012, 7:21 Gregory wrote:
To try and help with categorizing images used specifically for
documentation (and which are specifically for extensions) - and to
help explain their importance to admins before they delete - I've created a
couple of headers:
-
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Roan. It's also interesting to learn about that clause.
I agree. I asked whether WMF had something like this
On 04/01/12 11:49, Max Semenik wrote:
On 04.01.2012, 7:21 Gregory wrote:
To try and help with categorizing images used specifically for
documentation (and which are specifically for extensions) - and to
help explain their importance to admins before they delete - I've created a
couple of
I know that's what they're SUPPOSE to do - but I've heard tales of other issues
as well. It hasn't been my personal experience that the Commons Admins do a
lot of overzealous deletions - but if it helps to prevent even one overzealous
deletion - yay. :)
I tend to agree it shouldn't be
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Gregory Varnum ad...@wikiqueer.org wrote:
I know that's what they're SUPPOSE to do - but I've heard tales of other
issues as well. It hasn't been my personal experience that the Commons
Admins do a lot of overzealous deletions - but if it helps to prevent even
Commons folk doesn't magically delete anything unless there is a
reason, nor do they instantly delete in most cases. If peoples uploads
are continently getting tagged for deletion, They should look at why
they are getting tagged.
___
Wikitech-l mailing
On 05.01.2012, 4:47 K. wrote:
Commons folk doesn't magically delete anything unless there is a
reason, nor do they instantly delete in most cases. If peoples uploads
are continently getting tagged for deletion, They should look at why
they are getting tagged.
I've seen them delete on sight
Le Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:25:23 +0100, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com a
écrit:
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
As some people may have noticed last week(ish) I went though and tag
most (if
On 03/01/12 15:26, Antoine Musso wrote:
Hello,
Just consider that those files have been created by their uploader
and that they granted a license for use on mediawiki.org
Whatever you do, please do not migrate to commons, or we will surely
loose materials in the process due to their
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Just consider that those files have been created by their uploader
and that they granted a license for use on mediawiki.org
I'm pretty sure we can't assume anything with licensing, The uploader
must state the license they
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure we can't assume anything with licensing, The uploader
must state the license they want it to be under.
If something is uploaded by a WMF employee or contractor and was
produced in the course of their work for
On 04/01/12 00:43, Brandon Harris wrote:
A caveat: if the images uploaded include any of the Wikipedia
trademarks (such as the puzzle globe) they've got a different copyright.
What about the image less the logo?
(yes, this is the reason screenshots should try to avoid WP logo... at
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Roan. It's also interesting to learn about that clause.
I agree. I asked whether WMF had something like this
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-August/067223.html
And they do!? very cool.
Is
I don't feel strongly about use of Commons - but have posted some MW images
there myself (I think...). Any images used in the public domain help section
I'd advocate for using there - if for no other reason than it's more accessible
to others wikis using them. Regarding MW.org only
I considered it in the past, but left when looking at the large amount
of files without copyright tags.
The problem of mediawiki.org is that they have many files whose
copyright status is unknown, but that -unlike wikipedia- were uploaded
by there authors (with high probability).
There are
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
As some people may have noticed last week(ish) I went though and tag
most (if not all) of the uploads from this year that didn't have the
licensing data. The
Am 31.12.2011 11:25, schrieb K. Peachey:
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
So the floor is open! What course of action should we take?
I suggest you create a mw page with the file names of
1. Category:Images with unknown copyright status
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Category:Images_with_unknown_copyright_status
2. Category:Files with unknown copyright status
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Category:Files_with_unknown_copyright_status
Op 31-12-2011 11:25, K. Peachey schreef:
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
So the floor is open! What course of action should we take?
* Notify all uploaders with unknown copyright files
*
Am 31.12.2011 12:21, schrieb Maarten Dammers:
Op 31-12-2011 11:25, K. Peachey schreef:
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
So the floor is open! What course of action should we take?
* Notify
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl
wrote: * Notify all uploaders with unknown copyright files * Sort
out
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Files_with_unknown_copyright_status
* Move all good files to Commons * Delete all bad files * Disable
local uploads
K. Peachey (2011-12-31 11:25):
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
As some people may have noticed last week(ish) I went though and tag
most (if not all) of the uploads from this year that
Op 31-12-2011 12:59, Maciej Jaros schreef:
This is probably because of UploadWizard
UploadWizard is not enabled at www.mediawiki.org. I think you're mixing
up Mediawiki.org and Commons
Maarten
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nlwrote:
Op 31-12-2011 11:25, K. Peachey schreef:
We currently have a large number of file uploads with no licensing
data on MW wiki! And we should really start doing something about it,
So the floor is open! What course
27 matches
Mail list logo
