[Wikitech-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Next steps regarding WMF-community disputes about deployments

2014-09-05 Thread David Gerard
I asked this on wikimedia-l in the recent discussion with no answer. I
was wondering what the status of this feature was ...


- d.


-- Forwarded message --
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Date: 1 September 2014 18:00
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Next steps regarding WMF-community
disputes about deployments
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org


On 1 September 2014 17:57, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote:

 The same, by the way, goes for VE, which should have had bail and give me
 what you have now as wikitext from the onset, and Flow which needs a bail
 and convert this thread to ye olde talkpage thread (which I fear will be
 batted away as reactionary crank talk, and by the time flow will be done
 unneeded anyway)


By the way:

Is Flow going to support the use case of cut'n'pasting a piece from
the article page to the talk page, as a lump of wikitext or as a piece
of rich text from VE?

'Cos if it doesn't, I predict that will be the sticking point with the
people who actually communicate on talk pages.


- d.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Next steps regarding WMF-community disputes about deployments

2014-09-05 Thread Danny Horn
Hi David,

Sorry, I didn't see this question on wikimedia-l. Yes, that use case is
important. We've got some ideas about a multi-editable scratchpad space
that's attached to the discussion thread -- it's early days on that
concept, but as you said, we really need to be able to support drafts, and
things like checklists, where multiple people are working through a list of
tasks, discussing items and checking them off when they're done. A
checklist feature is complicated, so we're a little ways away from that,
but I know it's something that we need to build.

In the nearer-term, we're talking about what we need in order to open up
editing of other users' comments. There are good reasons to do that; we
just need to make some changes to the interface to support it. We'll be
talking with interested people about this stuff a lot more over the next
couple weeks, to get more ideas and thoughts.

Danny


On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:

 I asked this on wikimedia-l in the recent discussion with no answer. I
 was wondering what the status of this feature was ...


 - d.


 -- Forwarded message --
 From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
 Date: 1 September 2014 18:00
 Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Next steps regarding WMF-community
 disputes about deployments
 To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org


 On 1 September 2014 17:57, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  The same, by the way, goes for VE, which should have had bail and give
 me
  what you have now as wikitext from the onset, and Flow which needs a
 bail
  and convert this thread to ye olde talkpage thread (which I fear will be
  batted away as reactionary crank talk, and by the time flow will be done
  unneeded anyway)


 By the way:

 Is Flow going to support the use case of cut'n'pasting a piece from
 the article page to the talk page, as a lump of wikitext or as a piece
 of rich text from VE?

 'Cos if it doesn't, I predict that will be the sticking point with the
 people who actually communicate on talk pages.


 - d.

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l