Re: [Wikitech-l] New DB_REPLICA constant; DB_SLAVE deprecated

I'd be happy to rename it to "source". It would be also great if we clean up puppet repo from bad terms If people want to follow the discussion, I'd recommend checking this ticket: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T254646 Best On Thu, Jul 2, 2020, 11:30 Jaime Crespo wrote: > > I don't plan

Re: [Wikitech-l] New DB_REPLICA constant; DB_SLAVE deprecated

> I don't plan on doing anything to DB_MASTER, since it seems fine by itself, > like "master copy", "master tape" or "master key" MySQL has announced they chose to use "source": https://mysqlhighavailability.com/mysql-terminology-updates/ We can consider updating too, I think it is a more

Re: [Wikitech-l] New DB_REPLICA constant; DB_SLAVE deprecated

Sorry for late question. I guess we should deprecate wfWaitForSlaves() and probably some other methods that still use this logic Best On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:22 AM Aaron Schulz wrote: > As of 950cf6016c, the mediawiki/core repo was updated to use DB_REPLICA > instead

[Wikitech-l] New DB_REPLICA constant; DB_SLAVE deprecated

As of 950cf6016c, the mediawiki/core repo was updated to use DB_REPLICA instead of DB_SLAVE, with the old constant left as an alias. This is part of a string of commits that cleaned up the mixed use of "replica" and "slave" by sticking to the former. Extensions have not been mass converted. Please