And here we go again:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)oldid=481885933#The_banner
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 09:37, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
A Wikipedia page loads. The last thing to load is the banner. This
pushes the page content down. If
H == Helder helder.w...@gmail.com writes:
A Wikipedia page loads. The last thing to load is the banner. This
pushes the page content down. If you've clicked on a link near the top
of the page, the banner grabs it instead.
And also further down the page, we aim for link 32, and as our finger
2011/11/21 Russell Nelson russnel...@gmail.com:
Perhaps we should keep the banner space there during the time of the
fundraiser, and if the person requests to not see Jimmy, then show them
Brandon. And if Brandon makes them unhappy (as if!), they could switch to
seeing pretty panorama photos.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
Hell no! When I say I don't wanna see any fundraiser banners, it
means i don't wanna see ANY banners related to the fundraiser, no
mater how pretty they look. Otherwise they will just go on the
AdBlockPlus list. You should
S == Strainu strain...@gmail.com writes:
S Otherwise they will just go on the AdBlockPlus list.
No wonder Wikipedia ads are so irritating (besides making babies cry),
they are the only ads on the net one still sees these days,
- Original Message -
From: jida...@jidanni.org
S == Strainu strain...@gmail.com writes:
S Otherwise they will just go on the AdBlockPlus list.
No wonder Wikipedia ads are so irritating (besides making babies cry),
they are the only ads on the net one still sees these days,
On Nov 21, 2011 1:48 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
S == Strainu strain...@gmail.com writes:
S Otherwise they will just go on the AdBlockPlus list.
No wonder Wikipedia ads are so irritating (besides making babies cry),
they are the only ads on the net one still sees these days,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Maybe we could have a script tag in the head that modifies the
relevant stylesheet rules based on cookies present.
D'oh, of course that's a better solution. And I'm supposed to be a
JavaScript expert *hangs head in
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Wow
the sense of (unwarranted) entitlement among most of those comments
complaining
about this policy is just... breathtaking.
Ads?? On MY websites?!?
-Chad
___
JB == Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com writes:
JB
http://www.jwz.org/blog/2010/11/please-read-a-personal-appeal-to-wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales/#comment-87364
Naw,
http://www.jwz.org/blog/2010/11/please-read-a-personal-appeal-to-wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales/#comment-87359
+ [8861]
- Original Message -
From: jida...@jidanni.org
Doing this doesn't work, and never did. Creepy Jimmy, with his come
to my van, child eyes invariably comes back,
like a particularly nasty genital infection, within 2 days at most.
Ok, JL? That is *right* around the bend to making you
Doing this doesn't work, and never did. Creepy Jimmy, with his come
to my van, child eyes invariably comes back,
like a particularly nasty genital infection, within 2 days at most.
Look, there have been numerous ways discussed to remove the banners
and never see them ever
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:33 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
JB == Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com writes:
JB
http://www.jwz.org/blog/2010/11/please-read-a-personal-appeal-to-wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales/#comment-87364
Naw,
Getting back on track here...
There's already a bug open for this issue in bugzilla (
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26234). Relative to the
current priorities for fundraiser engineering, this is pretty low. But if
someone outside of the team wanted to take a stab at resolving
This has already been hashed out technically, and is doable. The only
issue is getting people to standardize on a banner size, which I've
tried for the past few months to get people to agree on, but with no
luck. In order for this to work we need a benevolent dictator (Zach?,
Erik?) to state
FWIW, we have pretty much standardized on a banner height of 172px and, to
my knowledge, have no plans to modify that. If we did, it would get
smaller and not larger.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
This has already been hashed out technically, and is
On 22 November 2011 00:14, Peter Gehres li...@pgehres.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
This has already been hashed out technically, and is doable. The only
issue is getting people to standardize on a banner size, which I've
tried for the
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:18 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 November 2011 00:14, Peter Gehres li...@pgehres.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
This has already been hashed out technically, and is doable. The only
issue
A Wikipedia page loads. The last thing to load is the banner. This
pushes the page content down. If you've clicked on a link near the top
of the page, the banner grabs it instead.
This happened last year and it was reported then (and it was
incredibly annoying then too). It also fouls up stats on
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:37 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
A Wikipedia page loads. The last thing to load is the banner. This
pushes the page content down. If you've clicked on a link near the top
of the page, the banner grabs it instead.
This happened last year and it was
On 20/11/11 22:42, Roan Kattouw wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:37 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
A Wikipedia page loads. The last thing to load is the banner. This
pushes the page content down. If you've clicked on a link near the top
of the page, the banner grabs it instead.
Perhaps we should keep the banner space there during the time of the
fundraiser, and if the person requests to not see Jimmy, then show them
Brandon. And if Brandon makes them unhappy (as if!), they could switch to
seeing pretty panorama photos. I'll contribute this one:
22 matches
Mail list logo
