to handle queries
like mine.
Jarek T.
User:jarekt
-Original Message-
From: wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Kaldari
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:06 PM
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l
Tuszynski, Jaroslaw W. jaroslaw.w.tuszyn...@saic.com wrote:
Thanks for all the advice and for Tim.Landscheidt who run for me
https://jira.toolserver.org/browse/DBQ-201, the query that was the catalyst
for my email.
I wish there were clones or alternatives to toolserver based CatScan2
I do a lot of maintenance tasks on Commons, and many tasks require some sort of
database query to find the oddball cases. The queries can be done through one
of several ways:
1) Using CatScan and CatScan2[2] tools
2) Database query service [3]
3) Weekly Database reports [4]
Unfortunately lately
This is probably not what you want to hear, but one way would be to get a
Toolserver account.
That way, you wouldn't need the query service, you could run those queries
by yourself.
Petr Onderka
[[en:User:Svick]]
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Tuszynski, Jaroslaw W.
Feel free to drop me a mail off list, Ive got a TS account and will gladly
lend a hand with the reports
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Petr Onderka gsv...@gmail.com wrote:
This is probably not what you want to hear, but one way would be to get a
Toolserver account.
That way, you wouldn't
On 05/22/2013 04:03 PM, Tuszynski, Jaroslaw W. wrote:
So are there any non-toolserver based alternatives for database queries?
Well, there are always the Tool Labs[1]. Database replica access is
still experimental/in trial but it works.
-- Marc
[1]
There's also stat1.wikimedia.org, but I'm not sure who all has access to
that. I think just WMF staff and WMF-approved researchers, but I could
be wrong.
Ryan Kaldari
On 5/22/13 2:28 PM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
On 05/22/2013 04:03 PM, Tuszynski, Jaroslaw W. wrote:
So are there any
