Long message coming up... please be brave and take a look :)
This is a proposal to try and bring order to the messy area of interwiki
linking
and interwiki prefixes, particularly for non-WMF users of MediaWiki.
At the moment, anyone who installs MediaWiki gets a default interwiki table
that
i
Sorry about the borked line wrapping in the previous message - I'm
resending it so you can read it properly!
This is a proposal to try and bring order to the messy area of interwiki
linking and interwiki prefixes, particularly for non-WMF users of
MediaWiki.
At the moment, anyone who insta
You might want to have a look at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/New_sites_system .
That's more future proof than using the current interwiki system IMO.
Also we already use a subset of that for Wikidata.
Cheers,
Marius
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 22:06 +1100, This, that and the o
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:53 AM, This, that and the other <
at.li...@live.com.au> wrote:
> 1. Split the existing interwiki map on Meta [2] into a "global interwiki
> map",
>located on MediaWiki.org (draft at [3]), and a "WMF-specific interwiki
> map"
>on Meta (draft at [4]). Wikimedia-spe
Heya,
The Program Committee for the Architecture Summit has published a proposed
program: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014
Highlights of the Program:
1) We have tried to incorporate flexibility into the program by allowing 4
unconference break-out slots, 1 open plenary ses
That's where we are, right?
Some people on outages are reporting no-light on on-campus fibers*; if we
see an uptick in problem reports this morning, that might be why.
Cheers,
-- jra
* specifically DC2 to DC5
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
De
Hi,
Given that the Configuration cluster had the second most number of
votes in the poll, why was it left of the agenda entirely?
-- Legoktm
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Diederik van Liere
wrote:
> Heya,
>
> The Program Committee for the Architecture Summit has published a proposed
> program
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, legoktm wrote:
> Hi,
> Given that the Configuration cluster had the second most number of
> votes in the poll, why was it left of the agenda entirely?
>
We have been going back and forth between plenary session and breakout
session for Configuration, it's definite
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Diederik van Liere
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, legoktm wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Given that the Configuration cluster had the second most number of
>> votes in the poll, why was it left of the agenda entirely?
>>
> We have been going back and forth between pl
"Nathan Larson" wrote in message
news:CAF-JeUxsM-jQ85nij+OALA=rlolnppmhx7yhka1_hiz7m0a...@mail.gmail.com...
Why is it worth the trouble of maintaining two separate lists? Do the
Wikimedia-specific interwiki prefixes get in people's way, e.g. when
they're reading through the interwiki list and
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:35 PM, This, that and the other <
at.li...@live.com.au> wrote:
> I can't say I care about people reading through the interwiki list. It's
> just that with the one interwiki map, we are projecting "our" internal
> interwikis, like strategy:, foundation:, sulutil:, wmch: on
If I might weigh in here, I don't see the harm in including all the WMF wikis
onto the interwiki map.
MediaWiki is intensely related to the WMF, so those links make logical sense
and it does no harm to include them in my opinion.
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 22:40:37 -0500
> From: nathanlarson3...@
On 16/01/14 22:06, This, that and the other wrote:
> "Most well-established and active wikis should have interwiki
> prefixes, regardless of whether or not they are using MediaWiki
> software.
> Sites that are not wikis may be acceptable in some cases,
> particularly if they are
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I think the interwiki map should be retired. I think broken links
> should be removed from it, and no new wikis should be added.
>
> Interwiki prefixes, local namespaces and article titles containing a
> plain colon intractably conflict. Ever
14 matches
Mail list logo