Instead, it tells me that DirectSound (!)
detected no audio hardware, and I don't even get the first second. This is a
drivers problem (the SBLive/emu10k driver doesn't seem to support the
archaic /dev/audio, but wineoss doesn't use it, only dsound), but why is it
trying to use dsound when
I just picked up the latest cvs tree from corel and made the necessary
changes to my project for the dll separation. To get my project to link I
had to explicitly link a number of dll's including:
libcomdlg32.so
libcomctl32.so
libole32.so
libshell32.so
My question: is why are we doing this?
i had a look at the dialog boxes (and why they no longer work)
it seems the issue comes from a subtle change to PathIsRoot
previous version reads:
if path is like x:\ then ok
current version says
if pathis like x:\ and nothing after the \ then ok
so,
michael cardenas wrote:
I just picked up the latest cvs tree from corel and made the necessary
changes to my project for the dll separation. To get my project to link I
had to explicitly link a number of dll's including:
libcomdlg32.so
libcomctl32.so
libole32.so
libshell32.so
My
Thomas Dodd wrote:
While I think the DRAW beta is going well, beta2
still hasn't been released. You expect a CPP demo
to be stable next month? A lot must have changed
for beta2 :)
The release of Beta 2 is imminent. A lot of work
has been done since beta 1 and I expect a lot more
will happen
i had a look at the dialog boxes (and why they no longer work)
it seems the issue comes from a subtle change to PathIsRoot
I changed the FIleDialog in my tree so I didn't noticed this one.
What about this:
--- shlfolder.c Sun Apr 23 14:36:54 2000
+++ /usr/src/wine/dlls/shell32/shlfolder.c
Hallo,
some program crashes after going a long way. Running with +debugmsg
crashes, but doesn't get me to a point where I can use the debugger.
A +module,+task,+segment log doesn't show the native NTDLL gets
loaded.
Loading stabs debug symbols from /spare/bon/wine/dlls/libdinput.so (0x41122000)
Some of our users have asked if Wine applications could support
the standard X paste using middle mouse button feature. I'm looking
for some comments on:
- whether this would be a good feature
- how hard it would be to implement in Wine
- is it is something that should be configurable
(e.g. in
Uwe Bonnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
some program crashes after going a long way. Running with +debugmsg
crashes, but doesn't get me to a point where I can use the debugger.
A +module,+task,+segment log doesn't show the native NTDLL gets
loaded.
The crash is in EnterCriticalSection, which
Some of our users have asked if Wine applications could support
the standard X paste using middle mouse button feature. I'm looking
for some comments on:
- whether this would be a good feature
It can't hurt, can it.
- how hard it would be to implement in Wine
Probably not very. This patch
That's no good. I'll figure out how to make a unified .so, that's what I need.
I think we should still have an option for this in configure.
___
Michael CardenasDeneba
I also did some looking into this, but not a lot.
I found that my patch fails with a debugmsg +relay. So something with
the relay messages is causing the problems. In fact the patch works with
debugmsg +all,-relay. I have not had time to track down why relay
messages are causing the crash.
I'm looking into why black cursors disappear on a black background, I found
this comment in the code:
windows/x11drv/mouse.c
/* We have to do some magic here, as cursors are not fully
* compatible between Windows and X11. Under X11, there
* are only 3
Given the amount of progress Wine has made over the past year,
it seems (to me anyway) that the time may be appropriate to
try for Wine version 1.0.
I was hoping to spark a conversation on this topic, in two basic areas:
1. Should we do it? (If not, why not, and when?)
2. What needs
Aric wrote:
I also did some looking into this, but not a lot.
I found that my patch fails with a debugmsg +relay. So something with
the relay messages is causing the problems. In fact the patch works with
debugmsg +all,-relay. I have not had time to track down why relay
messages are
Given the amount of progress Wine has made over the past year,
it seems (to me anyway) that the time may be appropriate to
try for Wine version 1.0.
Perhaps, but personally I see Wine version 1.0 more
like a marketing gimmick, not something that has
large technical advantages for users or
Patrik Stridvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* configure.in,
tools/wrc/genres.c,
tools/wrc/parser.y,
tools/wrc/wrc.c,
tools/wrc/wrc.h:
Fixed byte order on Solaris and FreeBSD.
Why not simply use the existing AC_C_BIGENDIAN configure check?
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo