Re: unsigned chars

2001-01-19 Thread Eric Pouech
just a quick thought wouldn't it be better to change the default sign-ness of char on PPC ? All code has been written with char being signed in mind. there may be lots of other spots where the assumption is made and will have to be delt with. also supporting both signed and unsigned char may

Re: unsigned chars

2001-01-19 Thread Josh DuBois
Eric Pouech wrote: just a quick thought wouldn't it be better to change the default sign-ness of char on PPC ? Yes! I reckon it would. I have to run off right now: I'll re-submit later today or tommorow. Josh. Hi - uitools.c had some chars compared to -1 : those are

Re: documentation patch

2001-01-19 Thread John R. Sheets
On Jan 18, 2001, Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:09:35AM -0600, Jeremy White wrote: then documentation/wine-doc contains a nice set of HTML pages that can be used by the user (or tarballed into an RPM g). I've had problems building the documentation on a

RE: documentation patch

2001-01-19 Thread Neulinger, Nathan R.
NOTE: You'll want to run autoconf before reconfiguring Wine. Unfortunately since the patch adds a block of code to an early part of the configure script, and autoconf hardwires line numbers into the configure script, the extra diff noise turns the patch from a nice 1K

Re: unsigned chars

2001-01-19 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Eric Pouech" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: just a quick thought wouldn't it be better to change the default sign-ness of char on PPC ? All code has been written with char being signed in mind. there may be lots of other spots where the assumption is made and will have to be delt with. also

Re: unsigned chars

2001-01-19 Thread Josh DuBois
But what about winelib apps? Isn't it likely that there'll be a few assumptions about signed chars made in those, and shouldn't we generate makefiles for them that just make all chars signed, to ease porting? And if we do that, why not do it inside wine, too? Josh. Alexandre Julliard wrote:

Re: MSVCRT,Unicode

2001-01-19 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Jon Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To complete the cleanup, a couple of unicode calls (e.g. swprintf), stubbed in ntdll, are implemented in user32. Should: A- The implementation be moved into ntdll, and user32 made to rely on it, or B- ntdll be made to rely on user32, or C- the code

Re: unsigned chars

2001-01-19 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Josh DuBois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But what about winelib apps? Isn't it likely that there'll be a few assumptions about signed chars made in those, and shouldn't we generate makefiles for them that just make all chars signed, to ease porting? Some apps may require that, but we shouldn't

Notes and Java test on 20010112.

2001-01-19 Thread David . Goodenough
I installed 20010112 and tried Lotus Notes with it. The actionbar icons are now correctly on the right. Recently (I forget quite when) a new error appeared. Early on it produces a RtlpWaitForCriticalSection wait timeout, but retries successfully (the machine is an AMD K5-II 500, with 200Mb of

Re: MSVCRT,Unicode

2001-01-19 Thread Jon Griffiths
Whoops, Due to underzealous diff checking on my part, the patch will cause a regression on toupper/tolower; the following tiny patch needs to be applied after it: Cheers, Jon Content-Type: application/x-bzip2; charset="iso-8859-1";

Re: MSVCRT,Unicode

2001-01-19 Thread Jon Griffiths
wsprintfW() in user32 is not the same as swprintf(), it only supports a small subset of the possible format strings. We need a complete Unicode printf implementation in ntdll (or maybe in libwine.so). wsprintfW supports the formats I need at present, so implementing it in ntdll would just

Re: documentation patch

2001-01-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:44:43AM -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote: You could use a configure variable, like we do with @XFILES@ for conditional X11 compilation. In this case I don't think it is justified though; the doc is not built by default, so there is no point in making it conditional.

Re: Fwd: Re: MSVCRT,Unicode

2001-01-19 Thread Jon Griffiths
Why the app does _nothing_ with dllonexit stubbed is a mystery to me, but I am never surprised by any stupid thing a windows programmer might do. :-) Are you sure its dllonexit thats causing the problem? It shouldn't have an effect until the dll that called it is unloaded... Have you got

Re: Notes and Java test on 20010112.

2001-01-19 Thread Ulrich Weigand
The Sun one fails with the GetFastQueue16 error that I mentioned with the last drop. Does anyone know what needs to be done to build a default queue. I put in a suggestion last time but no one reacted to say whether it was the right approach. Also there was the question about how it

Re: documentation patch

2001-01-19 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe I understand you incorrectly, but a plain text or html version of the documentation should be provided with the normal tarball, just like we provide not only configure.in but also configure because there would be so many more questions/help