added a new test.
Such is life :)
Yes, its a bit dead at the moment, but I'm working on bringing it back to
life again. More news soon (hopefully).
Paul Millar
this problem as reversing this fixes the problem.
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Millar
.
Which version of wine are you using? What compiler did you use?
Paul Millar
then use this when
linking.
Paul Millar
Hi Uwe,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Test succeeds with native msvcrt.dll. Patch to msvcrt/file.c comming.
Is it worth marking the tests as todo and removing the todo once wine
passes the tests?
Just a thought ...
Paul Millar
the dsound tests...
Just thought people would be interested.
Paul Millar
number from the first.
See rfc2822 for more details.
HTH,
Paul Millar
.
Paul Millar
not that it not useful, it is. It's just that at first I hoped it
was running the tests on the real thing and reported the results. But I
guess that was a bit unrealistic.
With a bit of luck the tests should be up soon.
Paul Millar
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
Paul Millar wrote:
[1] - http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php
Wow. Does it really make sense to test against windows 2.0
or 3.0 anymore? I recall Windows itself was pretty much a joke
and terribly unstable until windows 3.1...
Probably
the improvement will depend strongly on the composition of the
cluster and the code you're compiling. The improvement (from running OM)
might be marginal in certain cases, but I don't think it would make things
worse.
Hmmm, time for some more experiments.
Paul Millar
] - http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php
Paul Millar
at the
moment)
Details of the build are available at:
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/buildinfo.php?id=271
Paul Millar
that require someone to sit in front of the computer. These could all be
turned off by default, but could be turned on through an option to
runtest, or via an environment variable (WINETEST_INTERACTIVE).
Does this sound reasonable?
(no pun intended ;)
Paul Millar
around. I tried it again today
(with cvs a few days old) and the problem still exists.
Paul Millar
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Greg Turner wrote:
cvs is the right way although I forget how it's done.
For the record, Gerard's writeup on how to do CVS regression hunting is
available here:
http://cvs.winehq.com/cvsweb/wine/documentation/cvs-regression.sgml
Paul Millar
/writefmtusertypestg.asp
makes it sound like we're supposed to be doing something here, yet Word
manages to save at least a simple document.
BTW the above happens whenever you want to save a file, not just with
Normal.dot.
Yes, your absolutely right.
Paul Millar
] - http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/corner.png
[2] - http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/corrupt.png
[3] - http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=6212
Paul Millar
.
BTW I tried just relay before and it was ~ 60MiB of data ... Assuming I
manage to recreate the problem, do you really want all of that?
Paul.
Paul Millar
help save some
space too and make it look less tall, hopefully without looking too
cramped.
HTH
Paul Millar
], wouldn't it be better to keep
it as a separate project (separate CVS, etc.) altogether?
How about adding this to WRT?
It should be fairly easy to add extra tests (such as running binaries) to
the conformance testing. Especially if the VB executables terminate
themselves.
Paul Millar
freebsd, ...?)
On the whole, I'd say we'd be better without the penguin.
Paul Millar
is to rein in the rights of the people
--President Bill Clinton, MTV interview, 1993
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Particle Physics (Theory Experimental) Groups Paul Millar
Department of Physics and Astronomy
it seems to be working.
These are vague reports of unrepeatable problems ... never a good thing!
I'm quite busy right now (real work and everything), so I don't have time
to investigate this myself. Just posting this hoping the cause its obvious
to someone else :^)
Paul Millar
in a somewhat ad hoc fashion because the exact rate the
Earth is slowing down isn't 100% predictable.
HTH
...
(Now returning you to your normal program :)
Paul Millar
it a kick?
Ta,
Paul.
Paul Millar
for the heads up, Paul.
No problem :^)
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Millar
much of a performance hit do you suffer here?
described by gcc team (and others), gcc 3.2 is about 5% slower than 3.0
(don't know why)
Ok, that's not too bad.
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Millar
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Paul Millar wrote:
[...]
Its difficult to gauge a percent-completeness for the rolling regression
testing. I'm quite happy with the functionality as it stands now
(although I've got a few ideas for improvements). Its been
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, tom wrote:
Paul Millar wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, tom wrote:
I have a pre-1 hacked together and request any feed back that you can give.
I'm doing rolling CVS regression/conformance testing and reporting back
whenever something breaks. How about adding
-related bug to turn out to be the culprit.
That said, gcc-2.96 was/is a completely fscked up release of gcc.
(even if gcc 3.2 is a bit slower to compile wine;))
How much of a performance hit do you suffer here?
--- Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I've had
Hi,
The test in dlls/kernel/tests/path.c:360 succeeds despite being marked
todo.
path.c:360: Test succeeded inside todo block: GetTempPathA should not
have modified the buffer
Trivial diff not included :)
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Millar
-winelib
Alternatively, we could have the regression keyword and also the
application, winelib, automated keywords. The bug-reporter adds
whatever s/he feels best describes their bug.
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Millar
to be an implementation of NtCurrentTeb
in ntdll.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Paul.
[1] http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/08/0006.html
[2] http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/07/0386.html
PS, I'll create a bugzilla in a bit.
Paul Millar
/int10.c,v
but according to
http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=102920866249678067241712
wine/dlls/winedos/int10.c should be on revision 1.16
HTH
Paul.
Paul Millar
Anyone else seeing anything missing in CVS?
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 11:11, Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11
it freeze forever?
Cheers,
Paul
[1] http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php?max=5start=102
[2] http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php?max=5start=94
Paul Millar
--- Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hi,
According to WRT [1], one of todays patches caused
might not be able to reply until tomorrow.
[1] http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php
Paul Millar
respectively)
BTW, the TODO test (line 2435) in dlls/oleaut32/tests/vartest.c succeeds.
Should it be move from TODO to a real test?
Cheers,
Paul Millar
-site (to try and fix
the regression tests), but I couldn't find them. As far as I can remember,
it was available from MSDN Home -- MSDN Library -- Windows Development
-- Win32 API ... but there's only a sample chapter from a book there now.
Cheers,
Paul Millar
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Vincent [iso-8859-1] Béron wrote:
Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
Paul Millar wrote:
[finding APIs on MSDN?]
It's still there, just spread out a lot.
Depends on what you are looking for. Usually, what I would do is type in
the search area the name of the function
in a moment, but I thought it best put all the
information in this email first.
Cheers,
Paul Millar
that these failures are known? If so, I've attached a
trivial patch to do this for the tests that failed for me ...
ChangeLog:
Mark failing regression tests as todo
Cheers,
Paul Millar
Index: dlls/kernel/tests/locale.c
Physics (Theory Experimental) Groups Paul Millar
Department of Physics and Astronomy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Glasgow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm
+44 (0
win95.
Cheers,
Paul Millar
Index: misc/version.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/misc/version.c,v
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -r1.51 version.c
--- misc/version.c 9 May 2002 19:36:28 - 1.51
+++ misc
On Tue, 21 May 2002, [iso-8859-1] Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
--- Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
c.f. Bugzilla id 681 ...
http://bugs.winehq.com./show_bug.cgi?id=681
Paul, I don't have a NT-like OS...
I configured wine to use --winver winme.
Sorry for the delay in replying
On Tue, 21 May 2002, [iso-8859-1] Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
tests/shreg.c:125: Test failed: (21,20)
tests/shreg.c:145: Test failed: (21,20)
c.f. Bugzilla id 681 ...
http://bugs.winehq.com./show_bug.cgi?id=681
Cheers,
Paul Millar
(), suggesting some linking
problem? The machine is running glibc 2.2.4 (via RedHat RPM
glibc-2.2.4-18.7.0.3) and I was compiling with the alleged v2.96 release
of gcc (RPM gcc-2.96-85).
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Paul Millar
Index: configure.ac
. kernel-2.[56] support for EA and
hidden files.
Paul Millar
Index: configure.ac
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.37 configure.ac
--- configure.ac12 May 2002 03:16:39
if the directory isn't
valid. This is the right thing, isn't it?
ChangeLog:
Wine now warns if Profile directory doesn't exist.
Paul Millar
Index: files/directory.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/files/directory.c,v
retrieving
. Unfortunately I'm rather pushed for time right
now, so if anyone fancies getting to the bottom of this, feel free.
Cheers,
Paul Millar
[1] - http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php
you assume
no regression in functionality?
What do you think?
Paul Millar
although its unusual, there's no reason an account name cannot
have a space in it, so
`whoami` should be `whoami`
[spent too much time debugging strings in scripts ;^]
Paul Millar
of definitions someplace so we don't need to
redefine them for each test.
Hmmm, was there an email about that a while ago? I thought Alexandre
wasn't happy with the idea, but I can't remember why...
Cheers,
Paul Millar
==4 version.dwMinorVersion0)))
Is this more correct?
Paul Millar
Index: dlls/kernel/tests/path.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/kernel/tests/path.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 path.c
--- dlls/kernel/tests
attached a patch that
just allows announcement of successful test results. I'm hoping it's
acceptable. Named tests can wait for another day ...
Paul Millar
Index: programs/winetest/runtest
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/programs
0xc: Test succeeded
IMHO, this is a lot cleaner than using trace messages, although there's
still the potential redundancy between a test's name and its error
message.
Thoughts?
Paul Millar
/atom.pl
and dlls/kernel/tests/directory.c (apologies to Alexandre Dmitry if I
got the test semantics wrong).
HTH
Paul Millar
ChangeLog:
Adding test names and some optional behaviour.
? dlls/kernel/tests/new
Index: include/wine/test.h
in O(n)
Is it worth the memory for that level of compatibility?
Paul Millar
On 29 Mar 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Actually ttydrv usually builds just fine without curses, it's just
that my last patch broke it. It should be fixed now.
Yep, seems to be fixed now. WRT should relect this after the next compile
cycle.
Cheers,
Paul.
Hi Everyone,
Just a couple of points:
I've detected a regression error: cvs doesn't build any more (at least not
for me).
See
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php
and
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/buildinfo.php?id=29
for details.
Also, this build fail
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Andriy Palamarchuk wrote:
--- Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/
Looks good. I don't know if we need this information
online.
True.
We could get away with just an email when something broke, but the web
interface
I was sitting in a sitting room,
Toying with some toys,
When from a room marked Gruesome,
There came a gruesome noise.
I've been toying with an automatic regression testing system over the
past month or so. The results can be seen at:
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/
Hi everyone,
I've been looking at the installer for Office97. You call setup.exe
which runs acmsetup.exe with a bunch of options, specifically:
'E:\~MSSETUP.T\~msstfof.t\acmsetup /T Off97Pro.stf /S D:\office\ '
Here, I've used single quotes to delimit the string. I'll carry on this
convention
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:
At 11:24 PM 2/10/2002, Marcus Brubaker wrote:
I doubt they would release absolutely as much as they can because
releasing *anything* can potentially forfeit a part of competitive
advantage.
Not true. There's always a cost/benefit analysis to be
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:
At 12:09 PM 2/13/2002, Paul Millar wrote:
This is the crux of the issue. What if the business model relies upon
retaining the IP-rights associated with the in-house written code? There
the cost/benefit balance would be tipped towards non-disclosure
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:
At 12:26 PM 2/13/2002, Paul Millar wrote:
[snip]
True for non-strategic code, but what about _strategic_ code (strategic in
the sense that the business model assumes the retention of IP-rights). If
this is based on BSD-licensed code
Some thoughts ...
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Roger Fujii wrote:
Daniel Sabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither the BSD or GPL is free, only public domain is free.
The problem with PD software is this screwed up litigious era we live
in the US.
Agreed!
Thankfully things aren't as bad here in the
Hi,
I stayed out of the previous licensing discussion, mainly coz I was
mulling over all the interesting comments. I'd like to make an observation
about GPL/BSD licensing issues (hopefully adding to the signal rather than
the noise side of the ratio :) then present an idea. I should preface this
.
--
Paul Millaryo-yo, n. :
Particle Physics Theory Group Something that is occasionally
Department of Physics and Astronomyup but normally down.
University of Glasgow, (see
69 matches
Mail list logo
