Well, last time the talking here was that due to QT license, KHTML couldn't be
used, and now with the Safari you don't need any QT (you can use other GUI
kits around)...
Actually Ender was de-Qting KHTML at some point, are you still around Ender?
I haven't seen the code but I expect you can
Hi,
Message d'origine
Sujet: Re: html browser for wine (khtml)
De: Mike Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 Jan 2003 09:14:54 +
snip
About duplication - I think it's probably most likely that the best course would
As i know, khtml support most of the IE-isms (for compatibility, try to actve IE
support in konqueror).
And for ActiveX, it must be simply supported by a khtml plugin (as crossover plugin
do)
If only it were that simple. Rather ironically the thing that led to me Wine in the
first place
Hi again,
Message d'origine
Sujet: Re: Re: html browser for wine (khtml)
De: Mike Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Date: 10 Jan 2003 09:47:41 +
As i know, khtml support most of the IE-isms (for compatibility, try to actve
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 22:27, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 8, 2003 02:11 pm, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Whats the difference? now you don't need QT, so license wise - it's
kosher ;)
But I guess it's still C++, no? I'm not sure if Alexandre will accept
C++ dlls...
Well, last time the
On January 9, 2003 10:44 am, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
As for C++ - well, anyone is welcome to look at mozilla code - I'm affraid
that it looks like a big spaghetti, compared to (pretty neat) KHTML code ;)
I'm not saying it's an unreasonable request. All I'm saying is that it would
be a change in
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not saying it's an unreasonable request. All I'm saying is that it would
be a change in policy to accept C++ code in Wine. So you need to take it up
with Alexandre :)
I'd prefer to avoid C++, but if there's no other choice then of course
we'll
On January 9, 2003 12:14 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
I'd prefer to avoid C++, but if there's no other choice then of course
we'll have to do it. I'm still hoping that we can find a way to avoid
duplicating all that code inside Wine, C++ or not.
Well, it seems the only worthy alternatives are
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 9, 2003 12:14 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
I'd prefer to avoid C++, but if there's no other choice then of course
we'll have to do it. I'm still hoping that we can find a way to avoid
duplicating all that code
On January 9, 2003 01:46 pm, Marcus Meissner wrote:
Actually there already was a Konqueror / WINE integration already, called
reaktivate. It replaced urlmon and provided a IWebBrowser interface.
Sweet! This is exactly what I was hoping for.
[...searching for it...]
Here's the original
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:28:38PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 9, 2003 01:46 pm, Marcus Meissner wrote:
Actually there already was a Konqueror / WINE integration already, called
reaktivate. It replaced urlmon and provided a IWebBrowser interface.
Sweet! This is exactly what I
On January 8, 2003 02:11 pm, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Whats the difference? now you don't need QT, so license wise - it's
kosher ;)
But I guess it's still C++, no? I'm not sure if Alexandre will accept
C++ dlls...
--
Dimi.
12 matches
Mail list logo
