gerard patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 06:32 AM 7/12/00 +0200, you wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, gerard patel wrote:
I have the following questions for the Linux specialists out there.
1) what are the chances of this patch to become the default in some near future ?
Slim if we
This is a follow-up on the thread on cemw
'Wine with ASS won't run stripped binaries' (see below)
With a 'kernel security patch', the default load address for modules
seems to be moved to 11 address, to get the Wine modules in the way of
the Win32 normal load address (40
gerard patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have the following questions for the Linux specialists out there.
1) what are the chances of this patch to become the default in some near future ?
Very small IMO.
2) what could be the best way to solve such problem :
- if a PE module where
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, gerard patel wrote:
I have the following questions for the Linux specialists out there.
1) what are the chances of this patch to become the default in some near future ?
Slim if we complain?
2) what could be the best way to solve such problem :
- if a PE module
