On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, gerard patel wrote:
> I have the following questions for the Linux specialists out there.
> 1) what are the chances of this patch to become the default in some near future ?
Slim if we complain?
> 2) what could be the best way to solve such problem :
> - if a PE module where preferred loadaddress = 0 gets an address below < 400000
>hex, print a
> warning.
I'd have thought the allocated address was above. It was the libc.so that
occupied the address that the Windows app wanted.
> - force the load address ?
Well, forcing a load of a windows binary into libc's mapping... I don't
think so.
