Re: [rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was "Re: Regression in lstrcmpiA (occurred in late June, NLS related)" from 2003 year)

On 04.07.2009 23:55, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote: > Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote: > I'm wrong - I don't have working windows installation at hands and cannot > check > that. Well, no answer so far; I thought "should write test, code is more welcomed than just words", and noticed that such test already present,

Re: [rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was "Re: Regression in lstrcmpiA (occurred in late June, NLS related)" from 2003 year)

Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote: >I've stumbled over problem with lstrcmpi sorting is still wrong. Some > japanese game engine uses binary search on presorted array, and fails > with a-la "object not found" errors. [...] > proper order should be "_" < "0" (ok) and "." < "_" (fails with vanilla > wine).

[rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was "Re: Regression in lstrcmpiA (occurred in late June, NLS related)" from 2003 year)

Hello! Previous thread on this topic: http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-devel@winehq.org/msg01080.html I've stumbled over problem with lstrcmpi sorting is still wrong. Some japanese game engine uses binary search on presorted array, and fails with a-la "object not found" errors. Judging by