engine by working with you and the code
you've written. If the mentor thinks they've done enough work over the
summer, they'll be paid - even if it's different than what they
originally proposed.
--Matt Finnicum
On 4/11/07, Felix Nawothnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. Forgot the patches. Here
, I can look into it
this weekend if it's still needed. If you don't find the problem
yourself, make sure to make a bug report and link to an executable
that demonstrates this :)
--Matt Finnicum
On 4/9/07, Andrew Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I run an app (Blitzin2) that displays
They had Wine listed last night when they first started posting the
projects (the list was only five projects long), but then they removed
the whole list for a while so they could finish preparing it. So I'm
assuming we'll be added from that as well.
--Matt
On 3/15/07, James Hawkins [EMAIL
in
other forums.
Have you ever logged onto the IRC channels? Their seems to be a
healthy community built up around them.
--Matt Finnicum (aka 'murph')
On 1/19/07, Jacob Alberty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a delphi developer (not limited to this language, I have done several
projects in C, C#, as well as assembly but for the purposes of this email I
am a delphi developer). I am experiencing some weirdness in regards to the
richedit control in
ES_MULTILINE set and uses a WM_SETTEXT in
response to the EN_CHANGE notification?
Thanks for your help with richedit,
--Matt Finnicum
I think that what James Hawkins had meant something like this:
Apply patch one, run the tests. If patch one fixed any of them, remove
the todo_wine's for those tests as a part of patch one. Otherwise,
leave them todo_wine.
Apply patch two, run the tests. If patch two fixed any of them, remove
On 12/10/06, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greenville is virtually abandonware and while its not really possible
to claim the font was ripped of it still was being developed under the
umbrella of the ReactOS project. Even if work on it is
/editor.c | 103 +++--
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
From fda32ff4aa4e9b5f6ace07d0f7ad8115cdde2360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Finnicum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 20:47:27 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] riched20
trace, and even more helpful
if you could include either test code or a compiled .exe that'd show
the problem.
Thanks,
--Matt Finnicum
What I do is to follow along with things on the shortlog:
http://source.winehq.org/git/?p=wine.git;a=shortlog
Lets say you want to move your current branch to my recent patch
riched20: Rewrite of scrolling and some redrawing code. - you'd
click the link commit to the right of it. In the page
--SNIP--
Second: Old version of Wine are still quite used because of package
managers just offers stable Wine versions over the unstable ones so I would
like
to see another popup or warning in winecfg that informs user that their Wine is
getting old... so after specific number of days(from
On 9/10/06, Tom Wickline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they have any common sense about them they will see that the
application database is advertised on the winehq front page and go
there on there own. You get out of Wine what you put into it!
Most users, as far as I can tell, never goto
Mark,
This patch, like the first one you submitted, is linewrapped (meaning
it won't apply cleanly). I'd suggest just attaching the patch to your
e-mail, so you don't have to worry about these things.
Also, it's always nice to have a conformance test for things like
this. Perhaps show that it's
Hello,
I'm not really sure what levels of permissions Bugzilla has, but could
I get the ability to modify bugs? (things like assign them to myself,
mark them as fixed, etc). If it's possibile, I suppose only having
such access to the wine-richedit component would be fine, too.
--Matt Finnicum
Hi,
Is there something wrong with this patch / a reason it's not being accepted?
Sorry if this might have been answered this on IRC last night - X died
while I was away, so I'd have missed it.
Thanks,
--Matt Finnicum
On 8/19/06, Matt Finnicum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've cleaned up / re
Ad i suppose this should go to wine-patches. Same as the original
patch, but properly destroys the temporary string when it's no longer
needed.
Thanks,
--Matt
On 8/7/06, Matt Finnicum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops! Good Call, Phil.
Attached is an updated patch.
--Matt
On 8/7/06, Phil
Oops! Good Call, Phil.
Attached is an updated patch.
--Matt
On 8/7/06, Phil Krylov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 07/08/06, Matt Finnicum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch modifies ME_CharFromPoint to work properly with password
controls (the patch i sent in / got committed a couple
On 6/25/06, Krzysztof Foltman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm definitely for using your conformance test code. And WM_GETFONT. Not
sure about the rest - the code in my patch is based on implementation of
EM_SETCHARFORMAT, so it's basically as good as that one.
Actually, GETFONT was a mistake -
I was just about to send in the same patch when you did. I'll have to
keep you updated on what I'm working on in the future. (You can see
what I'm planning to do for my SoC project at
http://wiki.winehq.org/MatthewFinnicum)
I've attached the patch I was going to send - I suggest we use some
From the viewpoint of a new developer (Summer of Code), having a few
The purpose of this function comments would have been / still would
be very useful!
It's painfully having to figure out what exactly a function does, that
calls five other functions that you have to look into, which each call
I will be working on riched20 for SoC - Initially I'll be working on
some unimplemented messages and styles, and then I'll be working on
some of the missing COM interfaces.
Details are at http://wiki.winehq.org/MatthewFinnicum
--Matt
On 6/1/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any
This was *supposed* to have been titled:
riched20: Implement EM_SETUNDOLIMIT and its conformance tests, take 3
Sorry!
--Matt
On 5/15/06, Matt Finnicum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Patch updated w/ Dimi Paun's advice (using #define's for the default
and max values), and slightly cleaned up
On 4/10/06, Phil Krylov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:43:59 -0400Segin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add these lines for those people that ask us how to use ~ARCH fontforge instead of RTFMing:
To enable ~ARCH fontforge without setting your whole system ~ARCH, do this (as root): echo
Gmail also:To: wine-develjust does any domain.On 4/2/06, n0dalus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On 4/3/06, Joao Inacio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I use GMail, and i can filter by subject or by to: header... but not cc:... some emails get filtered, and some don't so i need to keep sorting them.
In my
I'm at a windows XP machine right now.
I have no trouble deleting read-only files - I get the dialog informing me it's read-only, but then it allows me to delete it.Is it the same on 95/98?--MurphOn 3/23/06,
Huw D M Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:04:21AM -0600, Tom
26 matches
Mail list logo
