[WinPcap-users] snaplen only works when BPF is set ?

2005-02-14 Thread phengmaly peter
Hi ! It seems to me, that the pcap_open_live's snaplen argument has only effect when a BPF filter is set thereafter (pcap_setfilter). Is it the intended functionality ? (both 3.0 and 3.1b4) Thanks, Peter == This is the

[WinPcap-users] re: pcap_next_ex timeout after WaitForMultipleObjects

2005-02-14 Thread phengmaly peter
Gianluca Varenni [EMAIL PROTECTED] rta: Hi Peter. I can confirm that this is a bug that affects the capturing process with Wan Adapters (e.g. Generic NDISWAN adapter). I was very busy in the last months, but I'll work on a fix to this issue soon. It is important to point out that

Re: [WinPcap-users] snaplen only works when BPF is set ?

2005-02-14 Thread Guy Harris
phengmaly peter wrote: It seems to me, that the pcap_open_live's snaplen argument has only effect when a BPF filter is set thereafter (pcap_setfilter). Is it the intended functionality ? (both 3.0 and 3.1b4) At least on the original systems where BPF was implemented, the snapshot length was

[WinPcap-users] Generic and specific NDISWAN interfaces in WinPcap 3.1 beta 4?

2005-02-14 Thread Guy Harris
Somebody trying to capture on a serial port in Ethereal sent a long note about that to the Ethereal list: http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-users/200502/msg00140.html It says: 5) Because Windows PPP support is new, there is nothing about it in the Help portion of Ethereal (Live

Re: [WinPcap-users] Generic and specific NDISWAN interfaces in WinPcap 3.1 beta 4?

2005-02-14 Thread Loris Degioanni
Guy Harris wrote: Somebody trying to capture on a serial port in Ethereal sent a long note about that to the Ethereal list: http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-users/200502/msg00140.html It says: 5) Because Windows PPP support is new, there is nothing about it in the Help portion

Re: [WinPcap-users] snaplen only works when BPF is set ?

2005-02-14 Thread Loris Degioanni
Guy Harris wrote: phengmaly peter wrote: It seems to me, that the pcap_open_live's snaplen argument has only effect when a BPF filter is set thereafter (pcap_setfilter). Is it the intended functionality ? (both 3.0 and 3.1b4) At least on the original systems where BPF was implemented, the