Re: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup.

2004-08-05 Thread Gianluca Varenni
Have you tried winpcap 3.1beta3? Have a nice day GV - Original Message - From: Craig Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:49 PM Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup. The application is on Win2k, the adapter in an Intel 8255xx

Re: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup.

2004-08-04 Thread Gianluca Varenni
Ha - Original Message - From: Craig Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 2:28 PM Subject: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup. Sorry if this type of question has been asked before...but here goes. We have written a audio recording package, using

Re: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup.

2004-08-04 Thread Gianluca Varenni
Sorry for the previous mail, I hit send too early... Regarding your problem, have you tried to use winpcap 3.1beta3? What is the timeout you use when you open the adapter through pcap_openXXX? What operating system and adapter? Have a nice day GV - Original Message - From: Craig Carr

RE: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup.

2004-08-03 Thread Craig Carr
Rob, The memory remains completely static and the applications CPU usage never exceeds ~5%. Craig. -Original Message- From: Rob Henningsgard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:45 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup. Craig

Re: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap 3.0 lockup.

2004-08-03 Thread Rob Henningsgard
Craig, Can anybody suggest where to start looking? I hope you meant that: What does Windows Task Manager have to report about your application's CPU and memory usage, both when you first launch your package and then after it's been running for a few hours? Rob---