This is sending telemetry to Fedora.
Sep 23, 2021, 13:47 by dan...@dumke.me:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to connect to a Mullvad Wireguard Host with my Fedora Linux using
> nmcli, as soon as I up the connection (nmcli con up Mullvad) massive amounts
> of data are sent through the tunnel (according t
I'll roll it as well. If you see a news item about a murdered IT admin you'll
know the change didn't work this time and my users have sought retribution.
John-Paul
IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential information protected by the attorney-client priv
My trouble cases are installing it now. Thanks!
> On Sep 24, 2021, at 3:59 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:48 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> I'm going to cut a new release in the next few hours here. When that's
>> released
>
> v0.4.10 is now released.
Awesome indeed :-).
I'll contact our two affected users once 0.4.10 is released, especially the one
who managed to trigger it twice in one week
should be a good test candidate.
Cheers and a nice weekend,
Oliver
Am 24.09.21 um 19:53 schrieb Joshua Sjoding:
Awesome! Can do. Thanks Jason!
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:48 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I'm going to cut a new release in the next few hours here. When that's
> released
v0.4.10 is now released.
deed you need to hack
around with ndproxy.
But given that ISPs have near infinite IPv6 space... they should be able to
route you a simple /64 and technically, from a RIR perspective should even be
doing minimal /56 or even a /48...
Greets,
Jeroen
--
> On 20210924, at 17:31, tlhackque wrot
Awesome! Can do. Thanks Jason!
Joshua Sjoding
SCJ Alliance
IT Specialist
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:49 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I think we might be onto something with https://w-g.pw/l/ZO5Z ...
>
> I'm going to cut a new release in the next few hours here. When that's
> rel
Hey guys,
I think we might be onto something with https://w-g.pw/l/ZO5Z ...
I'm going to cut a new release in the next few hours here. When that's
released, would you try updating to 0.4.10, going back to using the
kernel implementation, and letting me know whether the problem
resurfaces? In the
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:31:40 -0400
tlhackque wrote:
> WireGuard server (Linux, details below) behind a site router that
> handles IPv4 NAT & an IPv6 tunnel.
>
> Server LAN has other hosts (and multiple subnets/vlans) - mostly dual stack.
>
> The WireGuard server is able to access the WireGuard
TLDR; It seems that WireGuard isn't supporting IPv6 NDP, and it should.
Use case & a work-around.
Full story:
Configuration:
WireGuard server (Linux, details below) behind a site router that
handles IPv4 NAT & an IPv6 tunnel.
Server LAN has other hosts (and multiple subnets/vlans) - mostly dua
On 2021-09-23 at 17:54:20 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Applied, thanks! I'm curious: is this a bug you ran into somewhere?
I've not seen this causing problems with wireguard-go specifically, but
have seen issues with leaked fds elsewhere. So by now I'm attentive of
the pattern and send fixe
On 2021-09-23 at 17:54:59 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I've applied this. Thanks for the patch. Though I do wonder: it's
> functionally the same as before, right? What instances lead to this
> being an issue? Or did this way just seem more correct?
Thanks. Functionally it's the same, yes. I
I can confirm that upgrading wireguard, and then upgrading to iOS 15
works flawlessly with the released bits.
Best wishes,
Alan
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 7:27 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:26 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:42 AM Anatol
13 matches
Mail list logo
