Do you find this true for Trango 900 also?
Yes. Definately.
If a SU915/900 Trango can't survive your noise level, nothing else would do
it better, period.
Trangos have built in circuitry to dynamically compress out noise, which
most other brands do not.
This has sometimes shown to be as
Inside a single case w/ a 2 port mPCI unit, such as a LigoW or StarOs
box
If using both cards on 5.3Ghz at full (fcc allowable) power, for different
secotrs, how much spectral seperation do they need?
I can calculate what's required for the external Antenna isolation in order
not to
I have been asked to set u[ wireless for an older motel. All rooms face
outside and it buildings are multilevel. There are two buildings
basically in line with each other. Building 1 is two story on front and
3 story in the back, 225ft by 60ft. Building 2 is 2 story on front with
a a row of rooms
In a similar setup to what you describe, two 60deg panels worked well at
a range of 80ft.
Mark McElvy wrote:
I have been asked to set u[ wireless for an older motel. All rooms face
outside and it buildings are multilevel. There are two buildings
basically in line with each other. Building 1
Just discovered qcheck for double checking throughput.
I install this on my laptop and a remote laptop during field surveys,
and between this and inssider, I have a pretty good idea of both
coverage and throughput.
Rogelio wrote:
Just discovered qcheck for double checking throughput.
I install this on my laptop and a remote laptop during field surveys,
and between this and inssider, I have a pretty good idea of both
coverage and throughput.
And for what it's worth, here is a direct d/l link for
- Rapid Link's Lead Technologist to sit on WiMAX panel -
OMAHA, NE - June 16, 2008 - Rapid Link, Incorporated (OTCBB: RPID), a
leading provider of WiMAX and Communication Services, is pleased to
announce that Chief Technology Officer Matt Liotta is scheduled to speak
as part of the WiMAX Progress
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Mike Prachar wrote:
- Rapid Link's Lead Technologist to sit on WiMAX panel -
Is it just me that get's tired of reading all about Rapid Link on
this list? I mean, this is not news I can use...it's just a
series of press releases done on WISPA's server. Seems to me that
It is pretty normal for members of an organization to share PR with
others in the organization. Are you suggesting members should be
charged for sharing PR?
-Matt
On Jun 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Mike Prachar wrote:
- Rapid Link's Lead Technologist to
Perhaps it should be shared on the members list?
I personally love the _advice_ and _comments_ given by members of the Rapid
Link crew. It is informative and comes from experience.
I really liked Matt's talk on 3Ghz and how to cut out the telco during
ISP-con.
I think, perhaps Mike might have
I'm always interested in news.
At least Matt is tearing up the internet world.
Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Mike Prachar wrote:
- Rapid Link's Lead Technologist to sit on WiMAX panel -
Is it just me that get's tired of reading all about Rapid Link on
this list? I mean, this
To turn the thread around... Maybe WISPA should think about doing its
own PR. Don't you think seeing, WISPA Member to be Featured at
Broadband Wireless World on the wires would get more people paying
attention to WISPA?
-Matt
On Jun 16, 2008, at 5:32 PM, George wrote:
I'm always
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Matt Liotta wrote:
It is pretty normal for members of an organization to share PR with
others in the organization. Are you suggesting members should be
charged for sharing PR?
First, you are not sharing PR with others in the organization.
This list is the PUBLIC list.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Matt Liotta wrote:
To turn the thread around... Maybe WISPA should think about doing
its own PR. Don't you think seeing, WISPA Member to be Featured at
Broadband Wireless World on the wires would get more people paying
attention to WISPA?
Was that the content of the post?
I'm not sure what your problem is exactly. The only reason we send PR
to the list is to share it with the organization. We don't receive any
search engine benefit since we already pay professional news
distribution companies to deliver our news to the public. See
On Jun 16, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Matt Liotta wrote:
To turn the thread around... Maybe WISPA should think about doing
its own PR. Don't you think seeing, WISPA Member to be Featured at
Broadband Wireless World on the wires would get more people paying
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Matt Liotta wrote:
No that wasn't the content of the post. My suggestion was for WISPA
to ride on the coattails of its members' PR. But while your
Hmmm...I suppose this answers the original question. Rapid is NOT
paying for the benefit (as a principle member) and you
On Jun 16, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
Hmmm...I suppose this answers the original question. Rapid is NOT
paying for the benefit (as a principle member) and you expect that
your $250 makes up for your using this list as a PR list for Rapid
(not WISPA).
What benefit exactly? You
Anyone serving this area???
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA
Sorry for the OT post, but I wanted to inform the community that I have
left Alvarion after 10 years. I have also moved back to Florida (Tampa
area). I will be taking much of the summer off, but will then re-engage
the industry as consultant. My company name will be Sageni. Sageni will
focus on
Butch, Matt, and Members,
Before this thread gets out of hand, a couple of notes...
1) WISPA does not have an offical policy yet on Press Releases sent to the
List, stating its OK or Not Ok. Nor does WISPA have an appropraite
mechanism or program to enable a WISP to pay for Sending PRs.
Just hit the delete key and ignore it if it bugs you that much.
All this extra traffic regarding it is a huge waste of time. Not to mention the
archives are public and as such can easily be found during standard due
dillegence processes.
Posts like the ones in this thread can certainly
Wow. I'm impressed and would have never have predicted this.
Good for you Patrick and all the best with Sageni. I'll be interested in
learning more about your new company as information comes available.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
These are my results on a 36 Mile Link with 3 foot Pac Wireless DP
wideband dishes on either end. Running a 36mbps modulation. I'm quite
happy with this, but it seems if I try to jump up to 48 mbps modulation,
my error come along quite a bit.
0 [tx] 1000 [rx] 1000 [rssi] -70 peer: [tx] 1000 [rx]
Thanks Brad. It was high time to leave. I'll also be interested in learning
more details about Sageni! :) I will get to work on it in earnest in
mid-July. Time to rest and play with my girls for a while. We are back in
FL, got here two weeks ago. This has been brewing for some time. That might
I've got a question, which I'm afraid might be a little stupid to some,
particularly those with RF backgrounds...
I've always thought that modulation rate was directly tied to RSSI (for
some law of physics reason or something), but someone else told me that
it's not like that (in theory) and
Charles,
All this extra traffic regarding it is a huge waste of time
I disagree. There are multiple purposes of this thread other than just
complaining and argueing.
It allows us to learn what our members feel about members and vendors
posting Press releases.
I'd like to encourage and see
RSSI, strictly speaking, is the received signal strength. (Received Signal
Strength Indicator) The signal can be totally unmodulated or modulated in a
very complex method with the same RSSI. I am wondering if what you are
asking is about the minimum RSSI needed. Generally speaking, the more
Pretty amazing, yeah!
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Kilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:45 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Trango Link 45
These are my results on a 36 Mile
I have been trying to think of a simple example. The only one that comes to
mind right now is listening to weak FM broadcast signal. If the station was
transmitting a pure tone, you could pick out the tone from the static on a
very weak station, but if that same weak station switched from
Cisco 851 router + Smartnet.
Cisco 871 router if you need VLANs
John
Rogelio wrote:
Ron Wallace wrote:
to All,
I have a small Medical practice that has requested a firewall for their LAN.
Which would you all recommend? Price rane below $1000, Doc woule prefer $500.
I just
I think your news is news that probably has left most speachless, probably
the last thing many people were expecting to hear.
RapidDSL wishes you success in your new ventures.
PS. Enjoy your summer with family!
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
-
I was impressed since it is a site where I have 5 PTP Alvarion B gear on
20mhz channels (all 2 foot dishes) and 2 Alvarion VL PTMP 120 Degree
sectors.
But we all get greedy, (NEED MORE BANDWIDTH A!!!). I'm just
trying to milk every bit out of the link I possibly can.
-Cam
-Original
Any bets on how quick some other manufacturer is going to try and snatch
you up?
I'm going with 16 months, 2 weeks, 3 days and ll hours from
now.haha...Oh and a few more gray hairs later.
Good Luck Patrick!
Cameron
Midcoast Internet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What gray? I am pretty much all silver now. Good for the speaking
circuit (sort of the elder statesman look), but I admit it tweaks my
vanity sometimes. Thank God I have two awesome little girls that help
keep me young and a bit silly.
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
I'm not sure exactly your question?
I'm also not sure there is a purpose, as much as reporting what occurs.
I'm also not sure if you are looking for an answer at the waveform level
versus the Link budget level?
RSSI is a factor related to Modulation. More specifically with OFDM.
Often in
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Patrick Leary wrote:
Sorry for the OT post, but I wanted to inform the community that I
have left Alvarion after 10 years. I have also moved back to
I think that there are very few things that I could read about that
would be more surprising than this. Perhaps that is
I think some disambiguation may be in order.
QAM is a vector modulation method:.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constellation_diagram
It shares almost nothing with OFDM methods.
Irrespective, all receivers (CW, AM, FM, SSB, VSB, angle modulation, OFDM,
QAM, TCM, etc) can have an RSSI output from
38 matches
Mail list logo
