Allan Marsallis got really good with RTS/CTS. He tried to teach me but I never
did really catch on.
I do know that you have to set ALL client radios the same way for it to work
right.
As I recall, it can make a huge difference on a highly loaded network though.
marlon
- Original
Hi All,
As a member of the FCC committee and a long term DC participant (first went
there as a WISP in 2001 or 2002) I feel I have to point out some critical
flaws in our proposals. I said much of this at the committee level but to
no avail.
First, let me say this though. The filing is
Marlon,
Good luck with your individual White Space filing.
I urge everyone who believes they have a better, a more constructive or
a more practical idea than WISPA's filing to go to the FCC website and
make an individual filing with the FCC immediately.
Here's the link to file
What CPU board are you using as this may limit your options?
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] cards
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:09:18
And what the internet has told you, is that we AREN'T GOING TO ASK to
remove ourselves from lists we DIDN'T ASK TO BE ON.
What a JERK.
Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Personally, I don't mind if someone sends me a single UCE with
something that relates
We have a reason for this, we design our sites with dual power work ease
of work ...Side A and Side B. Side A is connected to the UPS Plant,
Side B to Utility. In Case Of UPS failure, we are not out.
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143
I thought this thread was closed...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Isp Operator
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:23 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Spammers or not?
And what the internet has told you, is that we AREN'T
Similar to the last post what I often see is two UPS units coming from
two power grids/companies.
On 10/24/08, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a reason for this, we design our sites with dual power work ease
of work ...Side A and Side B. Side A is connected to the UPS Plant,
I agree with you Marlon. There seems to be fewer instances where the membership
is consulted on issues of importance regarding the FCC.
Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson Dt.
Addison, MI 49220
Phone: (517)547-8410
Mobile: (517)270-2410
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Depending on how your sites are designed, APC makes a Dual Feed AC swtich
for this purpose.
Thanks
Faisal Imtiaz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
MT RB411
Harold Bledsoe wrote:
What CPU board are you using as this may limit your options?
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Subject:
The other alternative I am aware of in that price range is the Engenius
cards which aren't that great IMO.
I have absolutely loved the Compex cards and the RB4xx series thus far.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't
Just a quick follow up.
A quick search of the internet shows up a lot of devices.
(APC makes a few different types).
These are either called Dual AC Automatic Transfer Switch.
Or depending on your voltage needs, you could modify an Dual AC power
supply module for Computer
Or find a AC to DC
UPDATE:
It looks like we are having an impact in the comments on the Whitespaces
NPRM. I have reviewed many comments this morning from WISPs, subscribers
and potential subscribers. We have some members who are going a step beyond
and alerting their subscribers and potential customers to support
My experience has been less then perfect with APC. The 19 rack ones have
been pretty good but the small 7 amp, 11 amp, tiny desktop models have gone
bad on me. Those units die way too often =/
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those
Yeah, but the whole idea is to have every device with dual inputs
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Friday,
Not necessarily - your goal is to keep it powered 100% of the time. What
part seems to go bad for you most of the time? The power supply, PoE, DC
jack, power company/UPS unit?
If the power supply on the board goes bad you're SOL, sorry. You'll have to
find another product.
If the PoE or DC
well THAT was super-easy to file comments. Took about 45 seconds. Everyone
should take 45 seconds for this...
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish [EMAIL
I would agree, it is very easy to go overboard and over engineer to the n'th
degree, however if you do that you will find that you would be introducing
more elements which would cause a negative effect.
E.g. Heat and power consumption...
Coming for the wired world, where only now folks have
I'll take that APC off your hands, free of charge.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Faisal Imtiaz [EMAIL
Isn't that what the elected are supposed to do? Make decisions as to what
they feel their constituency wants without directly asking them every time?
If you don't like whomever was voted in, you vote someone in that will speak
more in line with what you desire.
I would love to hear what
We currently use DC power supplies, but non-redundant
http://www.solaheviduty.com/products/powersupplies/sdp.htm. We use
terminal strips to distribute the power. For us to change, we just
replace the power supplies with this...
http://www.solaheviduty.com/products/powersupplies/sdnpred.htm.
I can tell you myself that I have personally spent hundreds of hours
toward this effort, as has Marlon. As with any group effort there is
no way to please everyone. After exhaustive discussions between
everyone over 3 plus years our FCC committee worked together to
develop a stance. I believe that
I'm going to ignore the first part of your email (since I'm sure others
will discuss), and point out a couple of things you missed:
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
I have MAJOR problems with the stance on adjacent channels. We give up 3
for 1 every time a TV channel, or microphone etc. fires up in
Maybe I'm asking too much here, but shouldn't the plan include something to
get it passed as quickly as possible as well as a defined pathway to what we
actually want? Again borrowing from 3650, a lot of devices can use the
lower 25 MHz, but the FCC is holding out on the upper 25 MHz until
Wait long enough, sooner or later it won't pay its mortgage on time.
haha, sorry :-D
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008
*nods* WISPA should have a solid stance, whatever that may be. That allows
individual operators to say (which I intend to do), I agree with WISPA
except on this one (or two) points.. I'm sure nothing proposed is so
grotesque to anyone that they couldn't follow if that was approved.
My
The difference between sensing in 5 GHz and sensing in TV spaces is that the
TV transmitters are published and easily accessed in terms of location,
height, transmitter power, etc. The military radars are supposedly secret.
Without long term spectrum analysis, you have no way of knowing if
What are you guys using to mount something like a RooTenna to a vent pipe on a
roof?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
One of the problems with sensing as it is proposed, there are no provisions
for the sensing to accommodate other unlicensed users in the spectrum, only
TV stations and other incumbent users. That's a big problem if you are a
WISP and someone fires up their unlicensed gear and takes out your
Mike Hammett wrote:
The difference between sensing in 5 GHz and sensing in TV spaces is that the
TV transmitters are published and easily accessed in terms of location,
height, transmitter power, etc.
But microphone users are not. The sensing proposals indicate that
sensing devices *must*
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
Isn't that what the elected are supposed to do? Make decisions as
to what they feel their constituency wants without directly asking
them every time? If you don't like whomever was voted in, you vote
someone in that will speak more in line with what
You are greatly encouraged to pass this email along.
Please take a few minutes to file comments on this proceeding. Comments are
due Tuesday, October 28th, 2008. The passage of this with friendly terms to
Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs) would be a great benefit to my
company,
If it is cast iron, I just mount what ever antenna directly to it. If
I need to extend it I use cast of slightly larger diameter and slip it
over. There is a cross cut (+) for 3 inches and 2 hose clamps, keeps
it pretty tight. If it is not cast iron or galvanized then I do not
touch them.
On Fri,
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Plea for TV Whitespaces Comments!
Is there a search
One point of technical clarification. The white spaces also address the
unused TV channels in an area, not just the spaces in between.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008
Well, I know of one thing you disagreed with right off John...the word
ubiquitous on the 2nd page...know how much you love that word.
ducking
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:43 AM
To: WISPA
Is there a search feature for the comments?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Rick Harnish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:32 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Indeed.
The highest channel here in the proposed space is 50, so there's I think 1
channel that's not between the lowest (2) and the highest. :-p
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Brian
Hi,
For those that have not seen it yet, Mikrotik made some major
improvements to their Nstreme protocol for point to multi-point
configurations. It is still in beta form, but it has made huge
improvements in latency and jitter on AP's with 30+ customers connected.
Here is the link to their
Anyone using Zcomax cards? I see a lot of radio makers use them
(Tranzeo, Ligowave/Deliberant). Not sure how they would compare on
static discharge issues.
Randy
Travis Johnson wrote:
MT RB411
Harold Bledsoe wrote:
What CPU board are you using as this may limit your options?
-Hal
How do you import longitude and latitude data into google earth?
(I'm googling on how to do it, but don't see an easy answer)
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Ask Brian Webster. He's the mac when it comes to that stuff. So far
this month we've only had one failed install due to signal and it's
because we use his coverage maps in google earth to prequalify.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do
Import from what?
You simply search the coordinates and it points it on the map...
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=-4.815++-162.342ie=UTF8oe=utf-8client=firefox-all=1.054628,-140.625spn=152.614639,316.40625z=2iwloc=addr
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite
I heard a rumor from someone who used to work at Cisco that they will
discontinue their outdoor mesh line, but I have yet to confirm this.
Someone I know who is considering buying quite a bit of their outdoor
mesh stuff asked them if this was the case or not, and they said that
the Cisco rep
Nope, I already tested it. -RickG
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Josh Luthman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am no electrician by any means but I think using both the DC jack and PoE,
technically speaking, would freak the board's power supply out.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
46 matches
Mail list logo
