Michael,
The President's name is Craig Hiemstra, although I have never met him.
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Prachar
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 6:45 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subje
Does anybody have a personal contact at Prairie in Iowa? I have a
semi-urgent need...
Michael Prachar - COO
Voice: (1) 402-392-7502 PST (GMT -8 Hrs.)
Fax: (1) 402-392-7585 (Anytime)
mi...@rapidlink.com
WISPA Wants
Most ethernet ports are keyed by a 25MHz crystal. What you and others describe
is harmonics interference from this crystal. Which is common unfortunately
especially on poe based equipment. Sometimes in bad cases you have to as well
put ferruls on the power cable to the switch/poe injector as wel
I am getting to the point where I need a central system that lets me
track the network and records changes. For example something to put in
Sites and what Equipment is at each site, then if I move a device from
one site to another it logs that. If I make a change to a device it logs
what that c
I went through this issue with a ham repeater at a mountain top tower.
The repeater would key up and never let go as it saw some signal it
thought was a user. I was in a metal cargo container and the repeater
was in a frame building 20 feet away.
I could turn off the ethernet switch and the inte
What I am saying is that until there is an FCC licensed user on the site
there is no federal jurisdiction.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: NGL [mailto:n...@ngl.net]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:19 PM
To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Thanks everyone for the great input on 24Ghz.
Randy
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> Because there is no reason to buy a license for a link that is getting
> deployed to a customer pre-existing site for 6 months, until they move to
> their new office location.
> Because I was able to install the order wit
I am talking about physical damage i.e.: stolen components, broken solar
panels etc. Not use of the system.
Thanx
NGL
--
From: "Brian Webster"
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:10 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Malicious damage
> I
I believe it would be an offense to do so to a site with an FCC licensed
public safety transmitter. If you are only using unlicensed gear and they
use your unlicensed network I believe that is not the case. Now I'm not a
lawyer, so to get a proper answer to this you should consult one :-)
Thank
This happens right in my house. Since installing lots of extra ethernet
wiring, my ability to scan in the 2m and 150mhz areas has definitely
been hindered by all the off noisy channels. It happened because I
haven't bothered to use shielded cat5 at home.
At tower sites, we use shielded only. We
Is malicious damage to a tower a federal offense if I have government
agencies using my service to send and receive email and data?
Thanx
NGL
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
Separate the runs from each other by at least 12 inchs and if they cross
make it at a 90 degree angle. That is standard NSC spec for isolating
secure lines from crosstalk, but works for any kind of spurious radiation.
Shielded cable will work as well but this will be a quick fix.
Phil
On Sun, Ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
