Pong
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com wrote:
Ping
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I have a 100 police car deployment using alvarion 900mhz units with
static public ip addresses that roam through the city. Average
throughput is 1.2-1.5 mb down 350-700k up.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:03 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
A local city has contacted me to
Seems like I remember Butch Evans talking about a deployment he did like
this with Microtik.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:04 AM
To: WISPA General
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104574652501608376552.ht
ml?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop
* REVIEW OUTLOOK
* JANUARY 20, 2010
A 'National Broadband Plan'
One more solution in search of a problem.
The Federal Communications Commission recently told Congress that it
I have a client looking for a Radwin 1000 link.
Does anyone on this list sell these units?
If so, send me info off-line.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
That's what we're doing. grin Great minds and all.
It did come online for a bit yesterday. Not long enough to do any good
though.
Maybe they'll try a bit harder :-).
marlon
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
If you ever want to see your radio again, leave $14.95 in unmarked change in
the trash can at the corner of elm and main at 12 noon tomorrow. Don't
ignore this, we're serious. No cops!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
Hi Rick,
We've got a system up and running for a small town. It's working well last
I knew.
Not totally seamless roaming, but pretty close. It'll also work in other
communities where people have open routers.
Butch, your email is ringing!
marlon
- Original Message -
From: RickG
Reminds me of a thing that happened here a few years ago. Guy breaks into a
convenient store after hours. Steals a bunch of stuff, took this big box
thing from a shelf behind the counter that kinda looked like a safe.
Couldn't get the safe opened. Cops found it dumped at the park. Turns
out it
Got an email yesterday from Time Warner saying they are now taking Beta
Testers in my area for the TV Everywhere service. In case you missed it,
Comcast and Time Warner are teamed up to provide video content over
broadband like HULU and others. I assume that this is a product being used
to
Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more
likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American
households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece
(especially now that Rupurt Murdoch owns it) for the telcos.
jack
Jeff Broadwick
I still don't buy that number in the first place. I wish I knew more about
how Brian came up with it.
What % of rural households does that work out to be?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January
We have no one but ourselves to blame for that one.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Good point
Mike Hammett wrote:
We have no one but ourselves to blame for that one.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Jack Unger" jun...@ask-wi.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:27
I don't think it ignores that, it is suggesting that the private sector is
in the process of closing that gap, without government investment and/or
intervention.
I don't believe that it is arguable that coverage is increasing...that's the
net effect of the whole WISP industry.
Regards,
Jeff
Sure coverage is "increasing" but that's just a distraction. The issue
is that the current level of home broadband Internet access is way too
low and millions of people are deprived of Internet access at home (or
in a home-based business). The article is nothing more than a
thinly-veiled hit
I suppose you could look at it that way, but I didn't read that in there at
all.
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
http://www.wispa.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/Jack.JPG
:-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From: Jack Unger
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
Sure coverage is increasing but
Thanks Mike. Now you can see what I mean !!!
Mike Hammett wrote:
http://www.wispa.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/Jack.JPG
:-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From: Jack Unger
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:16 PM
To: WISPA General
Before I start tearing into things and make a mess for myself, can one have
a public IP behind a transparent bridge? I have a remote gateway that I
want to move the router functions away from and to a more accessible spot
one hop away but I would not like having to waste public IP's just to move
I do that all the time. Just be sure to use
mode=bridge (or ap-bridge) on one side
mode=station-wds on the other side
wds-mode=dynamic
wds-default-bridge=bridge1 (or whatever bridge includes ether1 and wlan1)
If a switch (dumb layer 2) would work, then the above configuration is the
same.
Josh
Yep, works just fine.
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bridge_two_Networks
Jim
On 1/20/2010 3:45 PM, Robert West wrote:
Before I start tearing into things and make a mess for myself, can one have
a public IP behind a transparent bridge? I have a remote gateway that I
want to
Cool. I thought as much. Thanks!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Public IP behind Transparent Bridge
I do that
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 15:45, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
Before I start tearing into things and make a mess for myself, can one have
a public IP behind a transparent bridge?
Yup. I can vouch for Josh Luthman's instructions. Heck, I have the whole
turn a pair of Mikrotik
Thanks for the link. I do transparent bridges within the network but never
tried to move a public IP over one.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Patient
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:41 PM
To: WISPA
I hear ya. If not by bridging, what other option could be used to move the
public IP? I NAT everything, public IP's big mega mucho $$ for me, hate it.
Can you route the public through a network that is all NAT? Just for future
knowledge
Bob-
-Original Message-
From:
Yes you can do route the publics over a internal private ip network but of
course you do not want/need to nat.
Drawback (advantage) is that people on the outside can not traceroute
through your internal network because you use private ips but that don't
prohibit them from reaching the public ips
OK, as I understand that the report is based upon the 477 data?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
Marlon,
See the attached report. Go to Table 2 on page
Nice teddy bear!
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
http://www.wispa.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/Jack.JPG
:-p
Thanks!
I feel real affectionate towards the little guy. That's why I keep him
here, real close by me for 18 hours every day.
Here's here right now and he just said "Hi Marlon".
BTW, he's wearing his Studebaker hat again.
jack
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Nice teddy bear!
-
I knew you did Marlon - I've seen your pics. I dont recall which equipment
you used?
-RickG
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.comwrote:
Hi Rick,
We've got a system up and running for a small town. It's working well last
I knew.
Not totally seamless
I'll be discussing this with Butch. Speaking of which - I had Butch upgrade
my RB750G firewall with his QOS script. I works very well!
-RickG
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
wrote:
Seems like I remember Butch Evans talking about a deployment he did
I that while moving or in place? I've used Alvarion 900 for fixed locations
before and wasnt too happy with the throughput. Of course, if it works 99%
while roaming, it would have bragging rights.
-RickG
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a 100 police
Ya, I figured you thought of that. Now, if you could redirect their web
session and phish them to enter in their contact info!
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.comwrote:
That's what we're doing. grin Great minds and all.
It did come online for a bit
Right: The Technology Policy Institute notes that at the current rates of
broadband adoption the U.S. is behind the leaders only by a number of
months, and all wealthy OECD countries will reach a saturation point within
the next few years.
Now, how many here are updating their business models to
Forgive me if I'm reading the report wrong but isnt deprived a strong word
considering the take rate according to the report is only 75%? My take rate
here is only about 20% of the LOS customers. Most people here either dont
want it or cant afford it. So, why waste resources building out to them?
Is that before or after the book?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.netwrote:
http://www.wispa.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/Jack.JPG
:-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From: Jack Unger
Sent: Wednesday,
Brian, nice job btw. -RickG
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Brian Webster
bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com wrote:
Marlon,
Read this take rate brief I wrote with one of the data companies I
work
with. It will take you about 10 minutes. It goes in to specific detail of
how the study was
Heya Brian,
That's the take I had on this. That the number of households services was
based on the 477 data. I didn't see any other data sets that would give an
indication of the number of actually services households.
If the study is based only on the consumers reported via the 477 it's
The latest version is MT gear.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wireless Roaming
I knew you did Marlon - I've seen your pics. I dont recall which
Is that directly off the pages of the Democrat National Committee Blast
Fax talking points of the day?
Shame on you, Jack.
There's easily 24 million households THAT DO NOT WANT OR WILL NOT PAY FOR
broadband.
I have some areas where I cover 100% of the households, nobody else does,
and yet, I
How about a splash page that says Congrats - you have won lifetime free
internet - just enter your name address here!
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] stolen
Marlon,
You are not reading the report. The census block consumer reported data
is
NOT FROM THE 477 DATA. This is information compiled from various large
marketing companies around the US and gets tabulated every 60 days. The
version I used was from the first two quarters of 2009 so it is
Try to find out what mac address is on which port-you can't do that with
the HP 1800's, you need something higher up the food chain.
John
Scott Vander Dussen wrote:
Nick-
Thanks for the info - I'm looking at specifications between the HP ProCurve
1810G Switch Series http://bit.ly/5g2F0B and
I knew Mark would chime in :)
Per my last post, my experience is the same.
The broadband debate reminds me a lot of the healthcare debate. Everybody
wants it but nobody wants to pay for it. I'm still waiting for my free
electicity, natural gas, water, sewer, television, etc, etc.
The bottom line
The 1810G-24 can. The 1800-24 8 can't.
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: John Thomas jtho...@quarnet.com
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:20 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Gigabit Switch
I refuse to feed the troll. I refuse to feed the troll. I refuse to
feed the troll. I refuse to feed the troll. I refuse to feed the troll.
MDK wrote:
Is that directly off the pages of the Democrat National Committee "Blast
Fax" talking points of the day?
Shame on you, Jack.
There's
Jack wrote and published a book...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
I refuse
I won't comment on the first parts. ;-)
The rest is completely true, other than Brian is talking about 24 million
households can't get it in the first place vs. 24 million households that
don't want it that you (and others on the list) took it to mean.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
49 matches
Mail list logo
