I can identify!
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:
At 8/14/2010 02:35 AM, RickG wrote:
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on who you were) that same outcome
has not happened for other races in similar situations in mankind's past
history.
I Yam What I Yam.
Popeye - 1936
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 2:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Broadband work with Indian Reservation
I can identify!
On Sat,
Must solder the static drain wire to the SHIELDED RJ45 connector. The radio
has a PLASTIC body. Picks up static like you do when you walk across the
carpet in the winter time.
You basically bond everything together then allow a path for the static to
go to ground.
From:
Strange. Maybe that's because of your... location. :-p
A neighbor\competitor of mine has one and seems to get a fair amount of use.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/13/2010 10:15 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
Already do takes 1-2Mbps at peak
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 17:15 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
I have an RB433AH running ROS3.30. It has been running well for months
or longer. Yesterday afternoon it lost the OSPF routes that come in
from the backhaul interface. I rebooted. Still no go. It showed 9
potential neighbors in Init
That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. The
link from device A to device B is the primary link for this part of the
network to the Internet. It is carrying 2-way traffic just fine. That
would seem to indicate that all the hardware level stuff is OK. I have
looked at
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:11:39PM -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. The
link from device A to device B is the primary link for this part of
the network to the Internet. It is carrying 2-way traffic just fine.
That would seem to indicate
I will power cycle the switch tomorrow. It is an industrial DIN-rail
mount that is not managed.
Scott Lambert wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:11:39PM -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
That all makes sense, but I think I have eliminated most of it. The
link from device A to device B is the
