Re: [WISPA] Seasickness guaranteed (no password)

2011-08-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Canada is just America's hat. I wonder why they were concerned. :p - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 8/1/2011 11:16 PM, Ryan Spott wrote: When Tranzeo bought out the mesh company Sensoria

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Adam Greene
Guys, I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile link. Not sure if it will reach that far ... Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love it, but wanted to stay in the $5k - $7k range on this one ... only need 50M FD at the

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Steve Barnes
Radwin 2000c could easily do that for $3K Steve Barnes General Manager PCS-WIN/RC-WiFihttp://www.rcwifi.com/ From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:36 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA]

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 8/2/2011 11:35 AM, Adam Greene wrote: Guys, I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile link. Not sure if it will reach that far ... Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love it, but wanted to stay in the $5k - $7k range on

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Adam, a SAF CFIP 106 could fit your needs too Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:36 AM To:

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Jerry Richardson
24GHz @ 3 miles is not going to be stable unless is never rains What about 5.4GHz? Moto PTP500 Lite will do 52Mbps now, and 105Mbps later and is DFS2 compliant :-) - Jerry From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Tuesday, August

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Ohh yeah 3 miles for 24 ghz is on the edge I didn't catch that detail. Go Radwin2000 certified for 5.4 ghz or a an80 in 3.65, Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Adam Greene
Yeah, we demoed a Radwin unit few years ago and got good results. But we need something outside the 2GHz - 5GHz spectrum. We have a 5.4GHz - 5.8GHz Mikrotik link there right now that is being beaten to death by interference. On 8/2/2011 11:43 AM, Steve Barnes wrote: Radwin 2000c could

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Both Radwin and Motorola PTP500 would work well under high interference, but if you want to go to a whole diff band, I would suggest against a 3 mile 24 ghz link, go with a Radwin 2000 in 3.65 Ghz . Its FCC certified for up to 20 mhz, providing a solid 100 mbps aggregate data rate for well

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_000_D26588DB857E2948835D6C7A27C9879E15DBBD68AEROMAIL1aerone_ Both Radwin and Motorola PTP500 would work well under high interference, but if you want to go to a whole diff band, I

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com On 8/2/2011 1:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type:

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Randy Cosby
I think you just jinxed that link! On 8/2/2011 2:32 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com On 8/2/2011 1:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: At

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-08-02 Thread Jeremy Parr
On 2 August 2011 16:32, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com wrote: I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years. Rain in the tropics and rain in the midwest are two *very* different things.