But it's not saying that the Baicells did either because they didn't Set
a provisioned speed for it. So what /should /it have reached ? Granted
the numbers are higher, but what does that mean ?
Maybe it says that one EPC/UE was configured for QCI 6 and the other for
3 ? Maybe the UE was
And the question to be answered is what is the reason for that? To
answer that you must eliminate all the variables you can. To just
assume either gear is better or worse because of these numbers without
knowing all the other variables is not the right way to go.
Ian
On 6/25/2016 12:22
It does seem to be apples and oranges. The CINR vs percentage of drop do
not square with my own testing, which was ~70 locations and using iPerf
rather than something off-net.
And when I started testing 15 Mb plans and speedtest, performance was
consistent with iperf testing, with known and
Generally I agree. But none of the competitor tests, save one, even approached
the provisioned speed.
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 09:30, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Adding foliage and faster speeds...I mean that speaks pretty loudly.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office:
I disagree.
I can publish info that shows my truck can go faster than yours, on
the "same" road under different conditions with a number of variables
not accounted for including speed limit, driver, traffic conditions,
tires, engine size, snow/ice/rain/clear sunny day, day/night and a dozen
Adding foliage and faster speeds...I mean that speaks pretty loudly.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 25, 2016 9:26 AM, "Ian Fraser" wrote:
>
> This info is like comparing apples and oranges. One with
This info is like comparing apples and oranges. One with foliage and
one without, one with 'Max 15/2' and the other no 'speed limit set'.
What other differences not shown here ? EPC (probably), Internet pipe
(maybe), Laptop and/or software used (probably), time of day (most
likely),