I can't tell that anything like that is happening with the plans.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:
> I also noticed strange numbers in the speed plans sometimes it would
> line up with a plan that we offered sometimes it would seem to pick a down
>
I also noticed strange numbers in the speed plans sometimes it would
line up with a plan that we offered sometimes it would seem to pick a down
from one plan and an upload that from a different plan.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Adair Winter
wrote:
> That's
That's interesting. so some lines show nothing for and down/up speed.
others shows some plan that we have. Is powercode just picking the user
with the highest plan for the block and displaying that? hmm
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
> Deployment is
The deployment file only has 65 rows in it. but for this area I wouldn't be
surprised if that was correct. i'll have to do some digging
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:
> The first value in the deployment data is a census block ID. That file
> reports
Deployment is your service offerings to the blocks. Basically, what blocks
can you cover at what speeds and with what technology. Subscription counts
actual subscribers in tracts.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Mike Hammett
wrote:
> Well then. That sucks.
>
>
>
>
The first value in the deployment data is a census block ID. That file
reports your coverage area, and what technology and speeds offered on a
per-census block basis. There should be a LOT of census blocks in the list
if you have a large coverage area like most WISPs. How many lines do you
have in
Interesting. I think I understand the data that's in the files for the most
part. The deplyment data looks like info about plans what whatnot. and the
subscriber info is the blocks/tracts covered.
We have over 350 lines in the subscriber file.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Chris Fabien
Well then. That sucks.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Fabien"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:11:11 PM
Mike, I should have at least several hundred that actually have subscribers
that powercode should have included in the CSV.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Mike Hammett
wrote:
> How many blocks are your subscribers in?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent
How many blocks are your subscribers in?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Fabien"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 30,
Powercode does not have a real coverage map. They do generate the
deployment .csv file, based upon the assumption of reporting any block in
which you have a customer as being deployed. That approach will definitely
generate incomplete results, but I'm seeing a way way worse problem.
Powercode was
Don't know for sure.
What would one do with it?
Here is a line from the file
48381021702,70,153.6,153.6,1,0
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Mike Hammett
wrote:
> Does PowerCode have any way to calculate the deployment file?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
>
Does PowerCode have any way to calculate the deployment file?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Adair Winter"
To: "WISPA General List"
*shrug*
When I do the export from powercode it dumps two .csv files.
DeploymentData.csv and SubscriptionData.csv. Both of which I just load in
to the fcc 477 site.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Hammett
wrote:
> Does Powercode do deployment or only subscriber?
>
Does Powercode do deployment or only subscriber?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Fabien"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday,
well that's not good. any good reason why powercode wouldn't have all of
them listed?
Have you reached out to them?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Chris Fabien wrote:
> Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from powercode in our GIS
> software, we found it was
I would strongly suggest that you reach out the the Ignite folks to assist you,
they have been extremely helpful
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:
> We were getting like 20 blocks from powercode when we should have several
> hundred...
>
I found it fairly simple to use TIGERweb (a census GIS) which has a query
tool, to draw some shapes and spit out the list of
Make sure your mcs rate is set to auto, not locked at one speed.
Judd
On Aug 30, 2016 3:23 PM, "Dan Parrish" wrote:
> Yeah, in a PTP situation, we get more than 500mbits/sec on the workbench.
> Replace one end with the "AP" and we get 25-30mbits/sec. I've adjusted the
>
Imported a shapefile of the census blocks and matched up the output from
powercode. We were getting like 20 blocks from powercode when we should
have several hundred...
On Aug 30, 2016 4:53 PM, "Kevin Sullivan"
wrote:
How did you check it?
*From:*
Yeah, in a PTP situation, we get more than 500mbits/sec on the
workbench. Replace one end with the "AP" and we get 25-30mbits/sec. I've
adjusted the transmit power to compensate for the difference in gain.
Seems like there's something not working correctly.
--danp
On 08/26/2016 04:03 PM,
How did you check it?
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Chris Fabien
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 8:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Powercode 477 Data Grossly Inaccurate
Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from
Working on our 477, mapped the deployment data from powercode in our GIS
software, we found it was grossly inaccurate, probably only has 10% of the
blocks in the file compared to ones where we have customers. Has anyone
else noticed this?
We were previously not mapping the output and just blindly
23 matches
Mail list logo