On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Eric Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a company that would like to track real-time and summary
information of internet activity of it's employees (by IP). They are
looking for summary information, not email content/instant messenger
chats/passwords.
You could also do a 6500 or 7600 with dual Supervisors power
supplies. Mine carries full routes, dual GigE to the world, supports
GigE, FE, ATM OC3, DS3, Packet Over Sonet (over OC3 or OC12), 48 96-
port ethernet blades, and the list goes on. They have AC or DC power
supplies. And they
On Aug 9, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
We use a hybrid approach, asterisk for many things, and a Vox like
company
(it may even be Vox, not sure as I just approve the payments, Bryan
is the
one that vetted the company). Our VoiP system is form fit and
function
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Thay just need to add a couple of features to the t45...
Better ethernet configuration options
5 10 40 channels support
gino
DD-WRT has Ubiquity versions now. Didn't have much luck with it as a
client (on a NS5), but haven't tried
That's where I've gotten my RMS boards most recently. Recently being
6-12 months ago...
On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Steve wrote:
Hi John,
I don't know about invictusneteworks.
--
John McDowell wrote:
Steve, do you normally by from invictusnetworks? I'm having trouble
getting
to
On Jun 26, 2008, at 8:27 AM, Drew Lentz wrote:
#3. With linking the cars directly to the cellular telephone links,
what effect WILL this have on WISPs? What happens when Verizon rolls-
out the in your car and in your home package that rolls the EV-DO
card into your monthly bill and you now
On Jun 20, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote:
I am probably way more rural than Tom DeReggi on this, and I could
not agree with him more plus add to it as far as the so called gov't
push to get broadband to the real rural markets. I think their
push is more of a ghost as far as
On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's all keep in mind that the redundancy is moot if you plug both
radios into the same UPS or outlet.
Who uses outlets?
All our mission critical gear is -48VDC. :)
-- Bryan
On Jun 12, 2008, at 7:49 AM, Wallace L. Walcher wrote:
Another WISP told me Packet8 works better on a wireless network than
Vonage.
It comes down to codec being used and the jitter buffer. Packet 8 has
a significant jitter buffer. There's a noticeable delay that's very
awkward. Really
David E. Smith wrote:
If i deny SMTP to all but the barracudas IP then won't people not be able
to
send email ?
Obviously you'll have to adjust your firewall rules a little bit, to match
your network. :)
All of my MX records point to machines running the same set of spam
filtering
Patrick Nix Jr. wrote:
So then, static or DHCP'd
We use DHCP for everyone, then hard code it in the dhcp config file
for those who want to get the same one each time (i.e. static IP).
As long as you can track who has what and when, it doesn't really
matter. You'll need to know when the feds
Travis Johnson wrote:
And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for
customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your
network if you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to
maintain any logs, or worry about your DHCP server having
I think that's the catch phrase... open meaning, not blocked. So don't
block p2p or any other traffic, just throttle it down... WAY down...
I gave a talk about doing this with Linux + HTB a couple of years ago.
I had our head-end traffic shaper doing classful queuing, giving each
type of
There are arguments for flat rate and for metered for most utilities and
services. All you can eat attracts people who don't want to worry
about overages, where tiered usage plans cater to the penny-pincher who
knows exactly how much (or little) he needs. For a service provider it
is much
Rick Harnish wrote:
My understanding (no research done) is that if there are strobe lights
installed, the towers do not have to be painted red/white. Therefore, many
tower companies are installing strobes to cut down on maintenance (painting)
of their towers. A night/day system which
I'm no expert, but I have seen many towers with significant height that
aren't painted.
Heck, to that extent, buildings over 200' would need to be red\white, then.
The best part about posting to large lists is how quickly third-party
information is either substantiated or shredded to
Nigel Bruin wrote:
On 19 Apr 2008, at 09:29, Christopher Orr wrote:
Rogelio-
I believe T-Mobile has that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the brand.
Yup. UMA using Kineto equipment.
Handover works well as long as you're not moving too fast. :)
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bryan Scott
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OSPF tips
rabbtux rabbtux wrote:
Played with OSPF some, but am unclear on how to use the
'area' parameter in my topology
rabbtux rabbtux wrote:
Played with OSPF some, but am unclear on how to use the
'area' parameter in my topology.
Unless yours is a multi-state topology with hundreds of routers, put
everything into Area 0. It keeps things really simple.
-- Bryan
The cell carriers aren't using G711. I haven't seen how much a UMA call
takes up, but I'd bet it's less than the 90K of G.711u. UMA basically
encapsulates a GSM stream inside of an IPSEC tunnel. EDGE traffic gets
up to 100K+ when surfing or downloading files, so I could see a data
stream
It's interesting to see how the wireless carriers are trying to compete
with VoIP and (at the same time) leverage the broader coverage of
broadband in areas where cell service is weak.
On the cool side:
A few of us here have been using T-Mobile's wifi service and GSM+WiFi
phones for the past
Anthony R. Mattke wrote:
Someone posted some questions about a year ago about IPv6 and most of us
looked at it and said yeah, some day.. but for a lot of us IPv6 is our
next step.
What about IPv6-IPv6 gateways/6to4 tunnels? Anyone configure one on
their network yet?
I've done this
Bill Price wrote:
We are just acquired a wireless network that has 3 tower locations. The
router they were using was a Dlink DFL210(?) they had set up with a 6MB
circuit. We need a router that will handle VLANS, handle more bandwidth if
needed, QoS, firewall (This network does a NAT). Were
Bill Price wrote:
We are in the process of looking for a new router for our network. What are
some routers that others are using?
What are you replacing? What are your needs, i.e. where's this thing going?
Mike Hammett wrote:
I am looking at getting a GPS device. I'd like it to work with many
different programs such as Google Earth, Radio Mobile, Kismet, etc.
What sort of features do I need it to have to work with these programs?
I'd also like to have it be an independent unit with
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a suggestion, but I would cross reference your cable loss settings
with
the manual's guidelines.
Your flaky behavior could be due to the ODU being overdriven or starved
for
power. Then again if you've already had
Brad Belton wrote:
If you like, please provide me the cable length and type on each end. Then
provide me the loss figures you have entered for each side. We'll compare
notes between yours and ours.
What version are you running?
Side A - 50' of LMR400 + 17' of RG58 (or 59, whatever the 50
27 matches
Mail list logo
