[WISPA] Installation Help

2020-03-03 Thread Jake VanDewater via Wireless
Any one have a recommendation for contract installation teams? Looking for a group of technicians that could assist with customer conversions for a significant network forklift. ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org

[WISPA] Any Juniper Experts?

2008-08-05 Thread Jake VanDewater
I have just acquired some Juniper router admin duties. I'm in need of doing some one-to-one static NAT translations. Is there anyone out there that can give me some guidance? (Swapping out with a MT is not an option right now) _

[WISPA] Bandwidth Management

2008-06-02 Thread Jake VanDewater
I'm looking for a bandwidth management box to set individual IP addresses for several subscribers. We currently use the Emerging Technologies solution, but over the past couple of months, two of them have failed in the field. I would like get something that is relatively inexpensive. What is

Re: [WISPA] Private vs Public addresses for end-users

2008-01-28 Thread Jake VanDewater
We are looking into doing DHCP Option 82 for our NMS DHCP subnet for our CPE devices. If I am understanding this correctly, through this option I will be able to designate the IP address(es) that are going to be allocated behind that CPE device. This way I will only have to track MAC address

Re: [WISPA] Private vs Public addresses for end-users

2008-01-28 Thread Jake VanDewater
Eric, I'm interested in how you pulled off the D-NAT. Did you use a pix to do this? I have been researching ways to do this with a 2800 Cisco router. From what I can find I will need to do some aliasing. Can you provide me some more insight on how you were able to accomplish? -Jaker

[WISPA] DHCP Option 82

2008-01-11 Thread Jake VanDewater
Has anyone implemented the DHCP Option 82 on their networks? From what I have read, this would be great for forcing network addressable bridges to handout a specified IP address and/or range of IPs. _ Make distant family not so

Re: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?

2008-01-11 Thread Jake VanDewater
We purchased a NetEqualizer last year, and we weren't impressed. It did not perform well compared to the Emerging Technologies box we use. The rate limits were not effectively enforced. -Jake Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:16:46 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Subject:

RE: [WISPA] Wireless Backhaul options/test/results

2007-12-10 Thread Jake VanDewater
Has anyone worked with the 80GHz licensed or 60GHz unlicensed gear from BridgeWave? They claim to be able to get the license work done pretty cheap in roughly 5 days. Thoughts? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wireless Backhaul options/test/results

RE: [WISPA] Wireless Backhaul options/test/results

2007-12-10 Thread Jake VanDewater
. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Jake VanDewater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:49 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wireless Backhaul options/test