PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
Thanks, Charles and Dustin,
The challenge I'm working on is to determine if the degregation of my test
link, is caused
Dustin,
While I haven't done any current work with the 2 foot Gabriel professional
series I've been hearing enough good stuff about it that I ordered one to
play with and see if it worth deploying.
So far I like the Gabriel antennas. However, I am starting to see a pattern
where the various
Tom,
I currently have several Pac Wireless 5.8ghz 2ft dishes running at
5.3ghz with no packet loss. Granted, the RSSI is 1-2db higher than it
should be, but they do work.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Dustin,
While I haven't done any current work with the 2 foot Gabriel
- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
Tom,
Can you try changing the MT to use only 5mhz or 10mhz of spectrum
just to see what
President
Rapid Systems Corporation
1211 N. Westshore Blvd
Tampa, FL 33607
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 11:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the radio.
A small bit of trivial regarding this issue
With higher order modulation schemes, the EVM (Error Vector Magnitude) can
be so high that even on a
]] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out
Moto/Orthogon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mario Pommier
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006
11:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16
DSSS interference
what brand?
dustin jurman wrote:
Thank you Charles, We use
PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the radio
List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the
radio.
A small bit of trivial
]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the
radio.
A small bit
I have a problem where BPSK modulation has packet loss due to interference
greater than QAM16 at good RSSI levels.
I am using tons of DSSS all around the troubled OFDM link. (16 PtMP links
totalled from two cells, 2 miles apart). And my DSSS links most likely are
the culprits causing some
12 matches
Mail list logo
