Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150') with
power that's able to adjust down to where it doesn't burn up radios. Has to
mount outside, and no, there's no way to run Ethernet or fiber in this
situation. Bandwidth is not that big of a deal - 3-6meg will be more than
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.comwrote:
Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150’) with
power that’s able to adjust down to where it doesn’t burn up radios. Has to
mount
150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX which
might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:08 PM, RickG wrote:
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason
Yes, clear LOS. Considered the Nanostations. Prefer a Mikrotik solution
though.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio
: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Yes, clear LOS. Considered the Nanostations. Prefer a Mikrotik
solution though.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re
-boun...@wispa.org]
*On Behalf Of *RickG
*Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2010 11:38 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.com
Ya, but I like the extra bells whistles on the NS2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX
which might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2010, at
!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Ya, but I like the extra bells whistles on the NS2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Greg
: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Ya, but I like the extra bells whistles on the NS2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less
I just learned that with new firmware, UBNT just added support for multiple IP
addresses on an interface. We were wanting that alot...
- Original Message -
From: RickG
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio
The Nanos have a hard time adjusting power down that far, though.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 11:38 AM, RickG wrote:
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley
: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
The Nanos have a hard time adjusting power down that far, though.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 11:38 AM, RickG wrote:
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2
Profito
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:24 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Then you have to have two, client and ap . if you are only going thru say
one wall, how about a single ruckus, the packman one.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not
penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried because
the cable runs are just a real big pain!!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun
2 Picos then
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:30 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings
...@wispa.org]
*On Behalf Of *Chuck Profito
*Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2010 12:24 PM
*To:* 'WISPA General List'
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Then you have to have two, client and ap . if you are only going thru
say one wall, how about a single ruckus, the packman one
'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not
penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried
because the cable runs are just a real big pain!!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
30, 2010 10:30 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not
penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried because
the cable runs are just a real
18 matches
Mail list logo
