them.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Forbes
and straight up smart
tactics.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 3:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
I agree that everything written in Forbes post
Council rejects wireless proposal
By Adrian Sanchez/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
COLUMBUS - The City Council rejected Frontier Communications' proposal
to deploy a wireless broadband network in Columbus in a 5-3 Monday night
vote.
Councilmen Joe Jarecke, Ron Bogus and Jim Bulkley voted in favor of the
I'm glad they recognized there would be a problem giving one person an
exclusive contract to serve the entire city, via city property.
I'm especially glad they got down to the technical details of unlicensed
frequency, in a public way.
Of course it helps when there is a councilman who
Wow...impressive! A city counsel that didn't fall for the snake oil
salesman...
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Council rejects
my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:30 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless
: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Most of the Muni contracts I have worked on so far are exclusive. An RFP
would have been a better way to resolve the issue. Just letting anyone
use city property is a sure way for failure. I'm not so sure
21, 2006 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal - exclusive
Are Exclusive MDU Access Agreements on Thin Regulatory Ice?
/2006issues/nov06issues/kandutsch_nov.pdf
/By Carl E. Kandutsch, Ph.D., J.D/
Good arguments can be made for and against exclusive, perpetual access
: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Tom DeReggi wrote:
They have been exclusive. But that is part of the problem. Some how some
people conclude that an open wholesale network gets around the legallity
and intent the FCC has for unlicensed spectrum.
But I also feel it is anti
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 2:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
They have been exclusive. But that is part of the problem. Some how some
people conclude that an open wholesale network gets around the legallity
, December 21, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
They get exclusive rights to light poles for a mesh deployment. I'm not
at all advocating these projects but at the same time I just can't see
several mesh muni projects per city being successful. I agree
DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Tom, I don't think asking
: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Brad,
There is a BIG difference. On tower agreements we do it with
non-interference clauses,or we buy up all the finite resources (in some
cases spectrum). Could you image what would happen if we went to a tower
owner and requested to be the ONLY
: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Hey try
.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
They get exclusive
: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal
Forbes,
My apologies if you find this offensive and my honesty may not win me
any fans here, but your advice includes some dishonest assertions and
your letter to your city council is, in my view, libelous regarding
Clearwire, threatening to your officials
16 matches
Mail list logo
