Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-24 Thread Matt
Mikrotik hasn't realized yet how much money they can make by implementing CALEA 100% and charging $100-$200 extra for a CALEA specific capture license... I could not agree more! Matt -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wirel

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-24 Thread Doug Ratcliffe
Tuesday, April 24, 2007 1:35 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23 > But does that meet CALEA specs? Not really, since it does not do the > MD5 hash and such. At least that is what I get from reading about > CALEA. Basically if a TTP doesn't sign off o

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread Clint Ricker
27;t take an abundance > of > time to institute and maintain. > > > > I'm curious- do you have a solution, working now, that uses the hardware > you > mention and OpenCALEA to deliver a product that will be accepted by law > enforcement, or are you just talking conce

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread Jeromie Reeves
rom a IP address onto disk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ralph Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 12:23 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23 It is lame because it is a featu

RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread Smith, Rick
st' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23 It is lame because it is a feature that the user community needs and wants, and the vendor is passing the buck. Not surprising, concerning their actions on FCC certification of other products. Mikrotik makes dandy rout

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread Frank Muto
in Orlando, FL. LaunchPad Pavilion J - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23 Why is that lame? I don't see where this is Mikrotik&#x

RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread ralph
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:55 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23 Why is that lame? I don't see where this is Mikrotik's problem or issue. I'm going to

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread Travis Johnson
Why is that lame? I don't see where this is Mikrotik's problem or issue. I'm going to keep saying this over and over and over (started over a year ago). Use a smart ethernet switch and mirror your main internet connection to a box that can capture the traffic. Then use something like openCalea

[WISPA] Mikrotik's (lame) answer to CALEA as of 4/23

2007-04-23 Thread ralph
I asked: > I have 3 of your licensed routers (level 4) When do you plan to > release a version of RouterOS that is CALEA compliant? > > Thank You They Replied: Hello, It already is, you simply have to enable sniffer of all traffic, and store the raw data on a server that captures it. You ca