pa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Josh Luthman
>Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:26 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] New link help
>
>If it's -71 both ways my guess is they're right on. 6db loss is kind of
>curious though. Does
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New link help
If it's -71 both ways my guess is they're right on. 6db loss is kind of
curious though. Does it
er 04, 2009 2:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New link help
5.8. Yes, -71 each way. Most 5.8 noise here is P2P, but is low.
Which one shall I wag Josh? I'm thinking the higher side, which is
actually easier to access. If I can tweak without a bucket truck I'll
sa
If it's -71 both ways my guess is they're right on. 6db loss is kind of
curious though. Does it fluctuate at all?
What kind of antennas?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains,
5.8. Yes, -71 each way. Most 5.8 noise here is P2P, but is low.
Which one shall I wag Josh? I'm thinking the higher side, which is
actually easier to access. If I can tweak without a bucket truck I'll
save some expense.
Mike
At 12:51 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
>Ignore noise floor/CCQ on Athero
10.6 miles. 5.8. I'm looking for a -65 dBm Rx on the link. It's
about 6 dB off. Fresnel zone is clear p2p. Each can see a "flashing
beacon" on top of the other. What I want to know which one to wag
first, or flip a coin?
Mike
At 12:46 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
>What is the distance of the
That helps. No, it is not passing traffic. I'll generate some. Thanks. Mike
At 12:49 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
>Are you passing traffic over the link yet? CCQ numbers are very
>inaccurate until traffic is going through. They usually improve.
>
>
>Mike wrote:
> > I just put up a new repeater s
Ignore noise floor/CCQ on Atheros cards. In every place I have tested, the
Atheros card will say -105 to -95 noise floor but the Canopy unit will say
-95 to -83. Never seen a higher noise floor then -95 on an Atheros card.
Is this 2.4 or 5.8? Are you seeing -71 both ways?
Josh Luthman
Office:
Are you passing traffic over the link yet? CCQ numbers are very
inaccurate until traffic is going through. They usually improve.
Mike wrote:
> I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the
> P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and
> think I'm close.
What is the distance of the link? What antennas? What wireless cards?
Travis
Microserv
Mike wrote:
> I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the
> P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and
> think I'm close. The signal at both ends is -71 dBm, but am
I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the
P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and
think I'm close. The signal at both ends is -71 dBm, but am
expecting better. I am going to "wag" one or the other (or both)
dishes, but wondered where to start. T
11 matches
Mail list logo
