Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a backhaul that goes to a
512k down/128k up satellite connection. Theoretically the pokey internet
connection shouldn't be able to send enough data through the network to flood
the network to capacity however I was
General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a backhaul that goes to
a 512k down/128k up satellite connection. Theoretically the pokey internet
connection shouldn't be able to send enough data through
] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a backhaul that goes to
a 512k down/128k up satellite connection. Theoretically
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
5.2.
Greg
On Jun 10, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Robert West wrote:
I thought I saw something about that in the UBNT forums. Are you running
the 5.2 final or the new Beta firmware?
Bob-
-Original Message-
From
I had the same issue yesterday. Changed out the radio and it works fine now.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a backhaul that goes to a
512k down/128k up satellite connection.
Same firmware?
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:41 AM, RickG wrote:
I had the same issue yesterday. Changed out the radio and it works fine now.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a
] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a backhaul that goes
to
a 512k down/128k up satellite connection
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
5.2.
Greg
On Jun 10, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Robert West wrote:
I thought I saw something about
turning it off, might be the best idea!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT, Aggregation, network latency
Though I'd pass this on.
I have BulletM2 as AP fed to two NanostationM5's as a backhaul that goes
to
a 512k down/128k up satellite
5.2 build 5.32 on both.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Same firmware?
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:41 AM, RickG wrote:
I had the same issue yesterday. Changed out the radio and it works fine now.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Greg Ihnen
11 matches
Mail list logo
