Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Erskine
Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Their belief is that there are companies getting government moneys but are NOT actually servicing the customer bases that they are being paid to service. That's why they want the 477 data. To prove or disprove who's stealing what. Ver ... cough cough er... c

Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
king to him though) I talked to. laters, marlon - Original Message - From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:32 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477 Most of this has been hash

Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Mike Hammett
wirelessworker.org/ Don Renner -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:34 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477 I'm not sure who CWA is, but the

RE: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Don Renner
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:34 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477 I'm not sure who CWA is, but the current measurements of broadband availability are just about worthless. - Mi

Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread David E. Smith
Don Renner wrote: Thought the list might like to see CWA's idea of reporting the FCC form 477. Additional info would be tiers of users, number of homes passed, speed tests, number of users by Zip +4, speed tests and a host of other goodies. Most of us will, I suspect, agree with the statement

Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Sam Tetherow
Most of this has been hashed over before, but there are two problems I see with their suggestions. First every communications company would be giving away essential customer information if they had to report customers by zip or even worse zip+4 along with speeds of those customers, especially

Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Mike Hammett
ECTED]>; "'WISPA General List'" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:03 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477 Thought the list might like to see CWA's idea of reporting the FCC form 477. Additional info would be

Re: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Mike Hammett
ECTED]>; "'WISPA General List'" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:03 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477 Thought the list might like to see CWA's idea of reporting the FCC form 477. Additional info would be

RE: [WISPA] CWA's suggested improvements of Form 477

2007-07-17 Thread Don Renner
Thought the list might like to see CWA's idea of reporting the FCC form 477. Additional info would be tiers of users, number of homes passed, speed tests, number of users by Zip +4, speed tests and a host of other goodies. Seems like CWA wants market research to find out size of Broadband provid