Patrick,
It is my understanding that there isn't a 3.5 GHz profile for 802.16e...
-Charles
** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 -
, October 09, 2007 11:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
There specs said 36dbm ( 5 watts ) I thought
On Oct 7, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr wrote:
I think it was 300Mil, not 5.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
320-256
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
There specs said 36dbm ( 5 watts ) I thought
On Oct 7, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr wrote:
I think it was 300Mil, not 5.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
-Original
Patrick Leary wrote:
On the Cisco note Matt, Cisco is making ASN gateways for WiMAX and so
far the only ones they have slide into our WiMAX macro base stations, so
we have and are doing considerable work with them to integrate some of
their pieces into ours.
Can you expand on that? The Cisco
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
All,
Again, remember that patrick works for 1 company while I personally
have the freedom as a consumer to talk to EVERYONE making equipment.
yes a licensed version will look like an unlicensed, but will be just
limited in
output
Now that we have read your post regarding Alvarion's market leading
position and your insight into the entire market, I'd like to know your
thoughts on using WiMAX in 5Ghz and 3.65Ghz. It is fair to say that most
readers of this list won't be gaining access to the ideal spectrum
profiles for
This isn't the wireless line card, but several vendors at WiMax World were
showing off the Cisco ASN Gateway (or at least a 7600 with a SAMI card):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8738/products_data_sheet0900aecd806cdb72.html
But you probably knew that.
Best,
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 5:20 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Alvarion (was Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?)
Now that we have read your post regarding Alvarion's market leading
position and your insight
muliple operating frequency overlay- MOFO
Atca ( telco term for a standard they use for rack mounted blade base
station equipment, with interoperability, you can potentially have a
base station unit with a Airspan blade for 3.65, an aperto blade for
5.4, and an alvarion blade for 5.8 )
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 6:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
All,
Bear in mind, Clearwire uses their own base station technology,
which is mostly Nextnet base stations ( now motorola ) . Nextnet's
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you
, 2007 3:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you wouldn't get a true mobile network but your network costs
would be around, yaknow, 300k for a market of 20k people for just
All,
Bear in mind, Clearwire uses their own base station technology,
which is mostly Nextnet base stations ( now motorola ) . Nextnet's
performance is not wimax, just really high power base stations and CPE.
4 QAM / 2 WATT output power / 8dbi directional antenna on the CPE
and I think around 10
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you wouldn't get a true mobile network but your network costs
would be around, yaknow, 300k for a market of 20k people for just
BASE station equipment.
The way to go if you are really worried about upward
MOFO? ATCA? SDR?
On 10/6/07, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you wouldn't get a true mobile network but your network costs
would be around, yaknow, 300k for a market of 20k people for just
BASE station
, 2007 6:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
All,
Bear in mind, Clearwire uses their own base station technology,
which is mostly Nextnet base stations ( now motorola ) . Nextnet's
performance is not wimax, just really high power base stations and CPE
: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
All,
Bear in mind, Clearwire uses their own base station technology,
which is mostly Nextnet base stations ( now motorola ) . Nextnet's
performance is not wimax, just really high power base stations and CPE.
4 QAM / 2 WATT output power / 8dbi
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
MOFO? ATCA? SDR?
On 10/6/07, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you wouldn't get a true mobile network but your network costs
would
My guess is it's MOTO a typo. try googling you should find the answer.
Senthil
Dylan Oliver wrote:
MOFO? ATCA? SDR?
** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON
**
**
2.5 has great range penetration. ClearWire, as an example, had solid
indoor coverage 2 miles away. I live in an apartment complex thats out of
coverage area, and it still works - I'm in the bottom floor of an
apartment complex, my unit has another unit behind it, a 4 acre forest
conservation
John,
The 2.5 GHz will push better for two reasons, one the power is higher,
and two, the product sophistication is much higher, with multiple
diversity options to dramatically improve link budgets.
Tower height is the same you'd plan for with 2.4 GHz. CPE choices will
range from outdoor mounted
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
2.5 has great range penetration. ClearWire, as an example, had solid
indoor coverage 2 miles away. I live in an apartment complex thats out
of
coverage
22 matches
Mail list logo
